Linear Independence of Vectors - Revision history

Lila: /* Evaluating linear independence */

2021-11-17T20:44:05Z

Evaluating linear independence

Lila at 20:43, 17 November 2021

2021-11-17T20:43:12Z

Lila at 20:40, 17 November 2021

2021-11-17T20:40:56Z

Lila: Created page with "Linearly independent vectors in $\R^3$ File:Vec-dep.png|thumb|right|Linearly dependent vectors in a plane in $\R^3.$ ..."

2021-11-17T20:39:03Z

New page

[[File:Vec-indep.png|thumb|right|Linearly independent vectors in <math>\R^3</math>]]
[[File:Vec-dep.png|thumb|right|Linearly dependent vectors in a plane in <math>\R^3.</math>]]

A set of vectors is said to be '''linearly dependent''' if there is a nontrivial linear combination of the vectors that equals the zero vector. If no such linear combination exists, then the vectors are said to be '''linearly independent'''. These concepts are central to the definition of dimension.

* An indexed family of vectors is a '''linearly independent family''' if none of them can be written as a linear combination of finitely many other vectors in the family. A family of vectors which is not linearly independent is called '''linearly dependent'''.
* A set of vectors is a '''linearly independent set''' if the set (regarded as a family indexed by itself) is a linearly independent family.

These two notions are not equivalent: the difference being that in a family we allow repeated elements, while in a set we do not. For example if <math>V</math> is a vector space, then the family <math>F : \{ 1, 2 \} \to V</math> such that <math>f(1) = v</math> and <math>f(2) = v</math> is a linearly dependent family, but the singleton set of the images of that family is <math>\{v\}</math> which is a linearly independent set.

Both notions are important and used in common, and sometimes even confused in the literature.
-->
<!-- weights 9, 5, 4
Here the first three vectors are linearly independent; but the fourth vector equals 9 times the first plus 5 times the second plus 4 times the third, so the four vectors together are linearly dependent. Linear dependence is a property of the set of vectors, not of any particular vector. For example in this case we could just as well write the first vector as a linear combination of the last three.
:<math>\mathbf{v}_1=\left(-\frac{5}{9}\right)\mathbf{v}_2+\left(-\frac{4}{9}\right)\mathbf{v}_3+\frac{1}{9}\mathbf{v}_4 .</math>

A vector space can be of finite dimension or infinite dimension depending on the maximum number of linearly independent vectors. The definition of linear dependence and the ability to determine whether a subset of vectors in a vector space is linearly dependent are central to determining the dimension of a vector space.

== Definition ==
A sequence of vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k</math> from a vector space {{mvar|V}} is said to be ''linearly dependent'', if there exist scalars <math>a_1, a_2, \dots, a_k,</math> not all zero, such that
:<math>a_1\mathbf{v}_1 + a_2\mathbf{v}_2 + \cdots + a_k\mathbf{v}_k = \mathbf{0},</math>
where <math>\mathbf{0}</math> denotes the zero vector.

This implies that at least one of the scalars is nonzero, say <math>a_1\ne 0</math>, and the above equation can be written as
:<math>\mathbf{v}_1 = \frac{-a_2}{a_1}\mathbf{v}_2 + \cdots + \frac{-a_k}{a_1} \mathbf{v}_k,</math>
if <math>k>1,</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{0}</math> if <math>k=0.</math>

Thus, a set of vectors is linearly dependent if and only if one of them is zero or a linear combination of the others.

A sequence of vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \dots, \mathbf{v}_n</math> is said to be ''linearly independent'' if it is not linearly dependent, that is, if the equation
:<math>a_1\mathbf{v}_1 + a_2 \mathbf{v}_2 + \cdots + a_n\mathbf{v}_n = \mathbf{0},</math>
can only be satisfied by <math>a_i=0</math> for <math>i=1,\dots,n.</math> This implies that no vector in the sequence can be represented as a linear combination of the remaining vectors in the sequence. In other words, a sequence of vectors is linearly independent if the only representation of <math>\mathbf 0</math> as a linear combination of its vectors is the trivial representation in which all the scalars <math>a_i</math> are zero.<ref>{{cite book|last=Friedberg, Insel, Spence|first=Stephen, Arnold, Lawrence|title=Linear Algebra|year=2003|publisher=Pearson, 4th Edition|isbn=0130084514|pages=48–49}}</ref> Even more concisely, a sequence of vectors is linearly independent if and only if <math>\mathbf 0</math> can be represented as a linear combination of its vectors in a unique way.

If a sequence of vectors contains twice the same vector, it is necessarily dependent. The linear dependency of a sequence of vectors does not depend of the order of the terms in the sequence. This allows defining linear independence for a finite set of vectors: A finite set of vectors is ''linearly independent'' if the sequence obtained by ordering them is linearly independent. In other words, one has the following result that is often useful.

A sequence of vectors is linearly independent if and only if it does not contain twice the same vector and the set of its vectors is linearly independent.

===Infinite case===
An infinite set of vectors is ''linearly independent'' if every nonempty finite subset is linearly independent. Conversely, an infinite set of vectors is ''linearly dependent'' if it contains a finite subset that is linearly dependent, or equivalently, if some vector in the set is a linear combination of other vectors in the set.

An indexed family of vectors is ''linearly independent'' if it does not contain twice the same vector, and if the set of its vectors is linearly independent. Otherwise, the family is said ''linearly dependent''.

A set of vectors which is linearly independent and spans some vector space, forms a basis for that vector space. For example, the vector space of all polynomials in {{mvar|x}} over the reals has the (infinite) subset {{math|1={1, ''x'', ''x''2, ...} }} as a basis.

== Geometric examples ==
[[File:Vectores independientes.png|right]]

* <math>\vec u</math> and <math>\vec v</math> are independent and define the plane P.
* <math>\vec u</math>, <math>\vec v</math> and <math>\vec w</math> are dependent because all three are contained in the same plane.
* <math>\vec u</math> and <math>\vec j</math> are dependent because they are parallel to each other.
* <math>\vec u</math> , <math>\vec v</math> and <math>\vec k</math> are independent because <math>\vec u</math> and <math>\vec v</math> are independent of each other and <math>\vec k</math> is not a linear combination of them or, what is the same, because they do not belong to a common plane. The three vectors define a three-dimensional space.
* The vectors <math>\vec o</math> (null vector, whose components are equal to zero) and <math>\vec k</math> are dependent since <math>\vec o = 0 \cdot \vec k</math>

=== Geographic location ===

A person describing the location of a certain place might say, "It is 3 miles north and 4 miles east of here." This is sufficient information to describe the location, because the geographic coordinate system may be considered as a 2-dimensional vector space (ignoring altitude and the curvature of the Earth's surface). The person might add, "The place is 5 miles northeast of here." This last statement is ''true'', but it is not necessary to find the location.

In this example the "3 miles north" vector and the "4 miles east" vector are linearly independent. That is to say, the north vector cannot be described in terms of the east vector, and vice versa. The third "5 miles northeast" vector is a linear combination of the other two vectors, and it makes the set of vectors ''linearly dependent'', that is, one of the three vectors is unnecessary to define a specific location on a plane.

Also note that if altitude is not ignored, it becomes necessary to add a third vector to the linearly independent set. In general, {{mvar|n}} linearly independent vectors are required to describe all locations in {{mvar|n}}-dimensional space.

== Evaluating linear independence ==

=== The zero vector ===

If one or more vectors from a given sequence of vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k</math> is the zero vector <math>\mathbf{0}</math> then the vector <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k</math> are necessarily linearly dependent (and consequently, they are not linearly independent).
To see why, suppose that <math>i</math> is an index (i.e. an element of <math>\{ 1, \ldots, k \}</math>) such that <math>\mathbf{v}_i = \mathbf{0}.</math> Then let <math>a_{i} := 1</math> (alternatively, letting <math>a_{i}</math> be equal any other non-zero scalar will also work) and then let all other scalars be <math>0</math> (explicitly, this means that for any index <math>j</math> other than <math>i</math> (i.e. for <math>j \neq i</math>), let <math>a_{j} := 0</math> so that consequently <math>a_{j} \mathbf{v}_j = 0 \mathbf{v}_j = \mathbf{0}</math>).
Simplifying <math>a_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + \cdots + a_k\mathbf{v}_k</math> gives:
:<math>a_1 \mathbf{v}_1 + \cdots + a_k\mathbf{v}_k = \mathbf{0} + \cdots + \mathbf{0} + a_i \mathbf{v}_i + \mathbf{0} + \cdots + \mathbf{0} = a_i \mathbf{v}_i = a_i \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{0}.</math>
Because not all scalars are zero (in particular, <math>a_{i} \neq 0</math>), this proves that the vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k</math> are linearly dependent.

As a consequence, the zero vector can not possibly belong to any collection of vectors that is linearly ''in''dependent.

Now consider the special case where the sequence of <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k</math> has length <math>1</math> (i.e. the case where <math>k = 1</math>).
A collection of vectors that consists of exactly one vector is linearly dependent if and only if that vector is zero.
Explicitly, if <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> is any vector then the sequence <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> (which is a sequence of length <math>1</math>) is linearly dependent if and only if {{nowrap|<math>\mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{0}</math>;}} alternatively, the collection <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> is linearly independent if and only if <math>\mathbf{v}_1 \neq \mathbf{0}.</math>

=== Linear dependence and independence of two vectors ===

This example considers the special case where there are exactly two vector <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}</math> from some real or complex vector space.
The vectors <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}</math> are linearly dependent if and only if at least one of the following is true:
# <math>\mathbf{u}</math> is a scalar multiple of <math>\mathbf{v}</math> (explicitly, this means that there exists a scalar <math>c</math> such that <math>\mathbf{u} = c \mathbf{v}</math>) or
# <math>\mathbf{v}</math> is a scalar multiple of <math>\mathbf{u}</math> (explicitly, this means that there exists a scalar <math>c</math> such that <math>\mathbf{v} = c \mathbf{u}</math>).
If <math>\mathbf{u} = \mathbf{0}</math> then by setting <math>c := 0</math> we have <math>c \mathbf{v} = 0 \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{u}</math> (this equality holds no matter what the value of <math>\mathbf{v}</math> is), which shows that (1) is true in this particular case. Similarly, if <math>\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0}</math> then (2) is true because <math>\mathbf{v} = 0 \mathbf{u}.</math>
If <math>\mathbf{u} = \mathbf{v}</math> (for instance, if they are both equal to the zero vector <math>\mathbf{0}</math>) then ''both'' (1) and (2) are true (by using <math>c := 1</math> for both).

If <math>\mathbf{u} = c \mathbf{v}</math> then <math>\mathbf{u} \neq \mathbf{0}</math> is only possible if <math>c \neq 0</math> ''and'' <math>\mathbf{v} \neq \mathbf{0}</math>; in this case, it is possible to multiply both sides by <math display="inline">\frac{1}{c}</math> to conclude <math display="inline">\mathbf{v} = \frac{1}{c} \mathbf{u}.</math>
This shows that if <math>\mathbf{u} \neq \mathbf{0}</math> and <math>\mathbf{v} \neq \mathbf{0}</math> then (1) is true if and only if (2) is true; that is, in this particular case either both (1) and (2) are true (and the vectors are linearly dependent) or else both (1) and (2) are false (and the vectors are linearly ''in''dependent).
If <math>\mathbf{u} = c \mathbf{v}</math> but instead <math>\mathbf{u} = \mathbf{0}</math> then at least one of <math>c</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}</math> must be zero.
Moreover, if exactly one of <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}</math> is <math>\mathbf{0}</math> (while the other is non-zero) then exactly one of (1) and (2) is true (with the other being false).

The vectors <math>\mathbf{u}</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}</math> are linearly ''in''dependent if and only if <math>\mathbf{u}</math> is not a scalar multiple of <math>\mathbf{v}</math> ''and'' <math>\mathbf{v}</math> is not a scalar multiple of <math>\mathbf{u}</math>.

=== Vectors in R2 ===
'''Three vectors:''' Consider the set of vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1 = (1, 1),</math> <math>\mathbf{v}_2 = (-3, 2),</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}_3 = (2, 4),</math> then the condition for linear dependence seeks a set of non-zero scalars, such that
:<math>a_1 \begin{bmatrix} 1\\1\end{bmatrix} + a_2 \begin{bmatrix} -3\\2\end{bmatrix} + a_3 \begin{bmatrix} 2\\4\end{bmatrix} =\begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix},</math>
or
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 2 \\ 1 & 2 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>

[[Row reduction|Row reduce]] this matrix equation by subtracting the first row from the second to obtain,
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 2 \\ 0 & 5 & 2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>
Continue the row reduction by (i) dividing the second row by 5, and then (ii) multiplying by 3 and adding to the first row, that is
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 16/5 \\ 0 & 1 & 2/5 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>

Rearranging this equation allows us to obtain
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \end{bmatrix}=-a_3\begin{bmatrix} 16/5\\2/5\end{bmatrix}.</math>
which shows that non-zero ''a''''i'' exist such that <math>\mathbf{v}_3 = (2, 4)</math> can be defined in terms of <math>\mathbf{v}_1 = (1, 1)</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}_2 = (-3, 2).</math> Thus, the three vectors are linearly dependent.

'''Two vectors:''' Now consider the linear dependence of the two vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1 = (1, 1)</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}_2 = (-3, 2),</math> and check,
:<math>a_1 \begin{bmatrix} 1\\1\end{bmatrix} + a_2 \begin{bmatrix} -3\\2\end{bmatrix} =\begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix},</math>
or
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 \\ 1 & 2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>

The same row reduction presented above yields,
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>
This shows that <math>a_i = 0,</math> which means that the vectors ''v''1 = (1, 1) and ''v''2 = (−3, 2) are linearly independent.

=== Vectors in R4 ===
In order to determine if the three vectors in <math>\mathbb{R}^4,</math>
:<math>\mathbf{v}_1= \begin{bmatrix}1\\4\\2\\-3\end{bmatrix}, \mathbf{v}_2=\begin{bmatrix}7\\10\\-4\\-1\end{bmatrix}, \mathbf{v}_3=\begin{bmatrix}-2\\1\\5\\-4\end{bmatrix}.</math>
are linearly dependent, form the matrix equation,

:<math>\begin{bmatrix}1&7&-2\\4& 10& 1\\2&-4&5\\-3&-1&-4\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>

Row reduce this equation to obtain,
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1& 7 & -2 \\ 0& -18& 9\\ 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0& 0& 0\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}.</math>
Rearrange to solve for v3 and obtain,
:<math>\begin{bmatrix} 1& 7 \\ 0& -18 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} a_1\\ a_2 \end{bmatrix} = -a_3\begin{bmatrix}-2\\9\end{bmatrix}.</math>
This equation is easily solved to define non-zero ''a''i,
:<math>a_1 = -3 a_3 /2, a_2 = a_3/2,</math>
where <math>a_3</math> can be chosen arbitrarily. Thus, the vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2,</math> and <math>\mathbf{v}_3</math> are linearly dependent.

=== Alternative method using determinants ===

An alternative method relies on the fact that <math>n</math> vectors in <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math> are linearly '''independent''' if and only if the determinant of the matrix formed by taking the vectors as its columns is non-zero.

In this case, the matrix formed by the vectors is
:<math>A = \begin{bmatrix}1&-3\\1&2\end{bmatrix} .</math>
We may write a linear combination of the columns as
:<math>A \Lambda = \begin{bmatrix}1&-3\\1&2\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}\lambda_1 \\ \lambda_2 \end{bmatrix} .</math>
We are interested in whether {{math|1=''A''Λ = '''0'''}} for some nonzero vector Λ. This depends on the determinant of <math>A</math>, which is
:<math>\det A = 1\cdot2 - 1\cdot(-3) = 5 \ne 0.</math>
Since the determinant is non-zero, the vectors <math>(1, 1)</math> and <math>(-3, 2)</math> are linearly independent.

Otherwise, suppose we have <math>m</math> vectors of <math>n</math> coordinates, with <math>m < n.</math> Then ''A'' is an ''n''×''m'' matrix and Λ is a column vector with <math>m</math> entries, and we are again interested in ''A''Λ = '''0'''. As we saw previously, this is equivalent to a list of <math>n</math> equations. Consider the first <math>m</math> rows of <math>A</math>, the first <math>m</math> equations; any solution of the full list of equations must also be true of the reduced list. In fact, if {{math|⟨''i''1,...,''i''''m''⟩}} is any list of <math>m</math> rows, then the equation must be true for those rows.
:<math>A_{\lang i_1,\dots,i_m \rang} \Lambda = \mathbf{0} .</math>
Furthermore, the reverse is true. That is, we can test whether the <math>m</math> vectors are linearly dependent by testing whether
:<math>\det A_{\lang i_1,\dots,i_m \rang} = 0</math>
for all possible lists of <math>m</math> rows. (In case <math>m = n</math>, this requires only one determinant, as above. If <math>m > n</math>, then it is a theorem that the vectors must be linearly dependent.) This fact is valuable for theory; in practical calculations more efficient methods are available.

=== More vectors than dimensions ===
If there are more vectors than dimensions, the vectors are linearly dependent. This is illustrated in the example above of three vectors in <math>\R^2.</math>

== Natural basis vectors ==

Let <math>V = \R^n</math> and consider the following elements in <math>V</math>, known as the natural basis vectors:

:<math>\begin{matrix}
\mathbf{e}_1 & = & (1,0,0,\ldots,0) \\
\mathbf{e}_2 & = & (0,1,0,\ldots,0) \\
& \vdots \\
\mathbf{e}_n & = & (0,0,0,\ldots,1).\end{matrix}</math>

Then <math>\mathbf{e}_1, \mathbf{e}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{e}_n</math> are linearly independent.

Suppose that <math>a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n</math> are real numbers such that

:<math>a_1 \mathbf{e}_1 + a_2 \mathbf{e}_2 + \cdots + a_n \mathbf{e}_n = \mathbf{0}.</math>

Since
:<math>a_1 \mathbf{e}_1 + a_2 \mathbf{e}_2 + \cdots + a_n \mathbf{e}_n = \left( a_1 ,a_2 ,\ldots, a_n \right),</math>

then <math>a_i = 0</math> for all <math>i = 1, \ldots, n.</math>

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 Now consider the special case where the sequence of <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \dots, \mathbf{v}_k</math> has length <math>1</math> (i.e. the case where <math>k = 1</math>).
 A collection of vectors that consists of exactly one vector is linearly dependent if and only if that vector is zero.
-Explicitly, if <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> is any vector then the sequence <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> (which is a sequence of length <math>1</math>) is linearly dependent if and only if {{nowrap|<math>\mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{0}</math>;}} alternatively, the collection <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> is linearly independent if and only if <math>\mathbf{v}_1 \neq \mathbf{0}.</math>
+Explicitly, if <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> is any vector then the sequence <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> (which is a sequence of length <math>1</math>) is linearly dependent if and only if <math>\mathbf{v}_1 = \mathbf{0}</math>; alternatively, the collection <math>\mathbf{v}_1</math> is linearly independent if and only if <math>\mathbf{v}_1 \neq \mathbf{0}.</math>
 === Linear dependence and independence of two vectors ===

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 A sequence of vectors <math>\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \dots, \mathbf{v}_n</math> is said to be ''linearly independent'' if it is not linearly dependent, that is, if the equation
 :<math>a_1\mathbf{v}_1 + a_2 \mathbf{v}_2 + \cdots + a_n\mathbf{v}_n = \mathbf{0},</math>
-can only be satisfied by <math>a_i=0</math> for <math>i=1,\dots,n.</math> This implies that no vector in the sequence can be represented as a linear combination of the remaining vectors in the sequence.  In other words, a sequence of vectors is linearly independent if the only representation of <math>\mathbf 0</math> as a linear combination of its vectors is the trivial representation in which all the scalars <math>a_i</math> are zero.<ref>{{cite book|last=Friedberg, Insel, Spence|first=Stephen, Arnold, Lawrence|title=Linear Algebra|year=2003|publisher=Pearson, 4th Edition|isbn=0130084514|pages=48–49}}</ref> Even more concisely, a sequence of vectors is linearly independent if and only if <math>\mathbf 0</math> can be represented as a linear combination of its vectors in a unique way.
+can only be satisfied by <math>a_i=0</math> for <math>i=1,\dots,n.</math> This implies that no vector in the sequence can be represented as a linear combination of the remaining vectors in the sequence.  In other words, a sequence of vectors is linearly independent if the only representation of <math>\mathbf 0</math> as a linear combination of its vectors is the trivial representation in which all the scalars <math>a_i</math> are zero. Even more concisely, a sequence of vectors is linearly independent if and only if <math>\mathbf 0</math> can be represented as a linear combination of its vectors in a unique way.
 If a sequence of vectors contains twice the same vector, it is necessarily dependent. The linear dependency of a sequence of vectors does not depend of the order of the terms in the sequence. This allows defining linear independence for a finite set of vectors: A finite set of vectors is ''linearly independent'' if the sequence obtained by ordering them is linearly independent. In other words, one has the following result that is often useful.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Both notions are important and used in common, and sometimes even confused in the literature.
--->
 For instance, in the three-dimensional real vector space <math>\R^3</math> we have the following example:
@@ Line 27: / Line 26: @@
 \mbox{dependent}\\
 \end{matrix}
-</math>--><!-- weights 9, 5, 4
+</math>
 Here the first three vectors are linearly independent; but the fourth vector equals 9 times the first plus 5 times the second plus 4 times the third, so the four vectors together are linearly dependent. Linear dependence is a property of the set of vectors, not of any particular vector.  For example in this case we could just as well write the first vector as a linear combination of the last three.
 :<math>\mathbf{v}_1=\left(-\frac{5}{9}\right)\mathbf{v}_2+\left(-\frac{4}{9}\right)\mathbf{v}_3+\frac{1}{9}\mathbf{v}_4 .</math>
@@ Line 189: / Line 189: @@
 then <math>a_i = 0</math> for all <math>i = 1, \ldots, n.</math>

Linear Independence of Vectors - Revision history

Lila: /* Evaluating linear independence */

Lila at 20:43, 17 November 2021

Lila at 20:40, 17 November 2021

Lila: Created page with "Linearly independent vectors in \R^3 File:Vec-dep.png|thumb|right|Linearly dependent vectors in a plane in \R^3...."

Lila: Created page with "Linearly independent vectors in $\R^3$ File:Vec-dep.png|thumb|right|Linearly dependent vectors in a plane in $\R^3.$ ..."