Difference between revisions of "Integration by Parts"
(Added video links) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Continuing on the path of reversing derivative rules in order to make them useful for integration, we reverse the product rule. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Integration by parts== | ||
+ | If <math>y=uv</math> where <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> are functions of <math>x</math> , then | ||
+ | :<math>y'=(uv)'=u'v+uv'</math> | ||
+ | Rearranging, | ||
+ | :<math>uv'=(uv)'-u'v</math> | ||
+ | Therefore, | ||
+ | :<math>\int uv'dx=\int (uv)'\ dx-\int u'v\ dx</math> | ||
+ | Therefore, | ||
+ | :<math>\int uv'\ dx=uv-\int vu'\ dx</math> | ||
+ | or | ||
+ | :<math>\int u\ dv=uv-\int v\ du</math> | ||
+ | This is the integration by parts formula. It is very useful in many integrals involving products of functions, as well as others. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For instance, to treat | ||
+ | :<math>\int x\sin(x)dx</math> | ||
+ | we choose <math>u=x</math> and <math>dv=\sin(x)dx</math> . With these choices, we have <math>du=dx</math> and <math>v=-\cos(x)</math> , and we have | ||
+ | :<math>\int x\sin(x)dx=-x\cos(x)-\int\big(-\cos(x)\big)dx=-x\cos(x)+\int\cos(x)dx=\sin(x)-x\cos(x)+C</math> | ||
+ | Note that the choice of <math>u</math> and <math>dv</math> was critical. Had we chosen the reverse, so that <math>u=\sin(x)</math> and <math>dv=x\ dx</math> , the result would have been | ||
+ | :<math>\frac{x^2\sin(x)}{2}-\int\frac{x^2\cos(x)}{2}dx</math> | ||
+ | The resulting integral is no easier to work with than the original; we might say that this application of integration by parts took us in the wrong direction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | So the choice is important. One general guideline to help us make that choice is, if possible, to choose <math>u</math> to be the factor of the integrand which ''becomes simpler'' when we differentiate it. In the last example, we see that <math>\sin(x)</math> does not become simpler when we differentiate it: <math>\cos(x)</math> is no simpler than <math>\sin(x)</math> . | ||
+ | |||
+ | An important feature of the integration by parts method is that we often need to apply it more than once. For instance, to integrate | ||
+ | :<math>\int x^2e^xdx</math> | ||
+ | we start by choosing <math>u=x^2</math> and <math>dv=e^xdx</math> to get | ||
+ | :<math>\int x^2e^xdx=x^2e^x-2\int xe^xdx</math> | ||
+ | Note that we still have an integral to take care of, and we do this by applying integration by parts again, with <math>u=x</math> and <math>dv=e^xdx</math> , which gives us | ||
+ | :<math>\int x^2e^xdx=x^2e^x-2\int xe^xdx=x^2e^x-2(xe^x-e^x)+C=x^2e^x-2xe^x+2e^x+C</math> | ||
+ | So, two applications of integration by parts were necessary, owing to the power of <math>x^2</math> in the integrand. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that ''any power of x'' does become simpler when we differentiate it, so when we see an integral of the form | ||
+ | :<math>\int x^nf(x)dx</math> | ||
+ | one of our first thoughts ought to be to consider using integration by parts with <math>u=x^n</math> . Of course, in order for it to work, we need to be able to write down an antiderivative for <math>dv</math> . | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Example=== | ||
+ | Use integration by parts to evaluate the integral | ||
+ | :<math>\int e^x\sin(x)dx</math> | ||
+ | Solution: If we let <math>u=\sin(x)</math> and <math>v'=e^xdx</math> , then we have <math>u'=\cos(x)dx</math> and <math>v=e^x</math> . Using our rule for integration by parts gives | ||
+ | :<math>\int e^x\sin(x)dx=e^x\sin(x)-\int e^x\cos(x)dx</math> | ||
+ | We do not seem to have made much progress. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But if we integrate by parts again with <math>u=\cos(x)</math> and <math>v'=e^xdx</math> and hence <math>u'=-\sin(x)dx</math> and <math>v=e^x</math> , we obtain | ||
+ | :<math>\int e^x\sin(x)dx=e^x\sin(x)-e^x\cos(x)-\int e^x\sin(x)dx</math> | ||
+ | We may solve this identity to find the anti-derivative of <math>\sin(x)e^x</math> and obtain | ||
+ | :<math>\int e^x\sin(x)dx=\frac{e^x\big(\sin(x)-\cos(x)\big)}{2}+C</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===With definite integral=== | ||
+ | For definite integrals the rule is essentially the same, as long as we keep the endpoints. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> | ||
+ | '''Integration by parts for definite integrals''' | ||
+ | Suppose ''f'' and ''g'' are differentiable and their derivatives are continuous. Then | ||
+ | :<math>\int\limits_a^b f(x)g'(x)dx=\big(f(x)g(x)\big)\bigg|_a^b-\int\limits_a^b f'(x)g(x)dx</math> | ||
+ | :<math>=f(b)g(b)-f(a)g(a)-\int\limits_a^b f'(x)g(x)dx</math> . | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This can also be expressed in Leibniz notation. | ||
+ | <blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> | ||
+ | :<math>\int\limits_a^b u\ dv=(uv)\Big|_a^b-\int\limits_a^b v\ du.</math> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===More Examples=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Application_of_Integration_by_Parts Examples Set 1: Integration by Parts ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Exercises== | ||
+ | Evaluate the following using integration by parts. | ||
+ | {{question-answer|question=1. <math>\int -4\ln(x)dx</math>|answer={{noprint|<math>4x-4x\ln(x)+C</math>}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{question-answer|question=2. <math>\int (38-7x)\cos(x)dx</math>|answer={{noprint|<math>(38-7x)\sin(x)-7\cos(x)+C</math>}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{question-answer|question=3. <math>\int\limits_0^\tfrac{\pi}{2} (-6x+45)\cos(x)dx</math>|answer={{noprint|<math>51-3\pi</math>}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{question-answer|question=4. <math>\int(5x+1)(x-6)^4 dx</math>|answer={{noprint|<math>\frac{(5x+1)(x-6)^5}{5}-\frac{(x-6)^6}{6}+C</math>}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{question-answer|question=5. <math>\int\limits_{-1}^1 (2x+8)^3(2-x)dx</math>|answer={{noprint|<math>1916.8</math>}}}} | ||
+ | {{noprint|[[Calculus/Integration_techniques/Integration_by_Parts/Solutions|Solutions]]}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Resources== | ||
+ | * [https://www.khanacademy.org/math/integral-calculus/integration-techniques/integration_by_parts/ Videos and exercises on integration by parts at Khan Academy] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Videos=== | ||
[https://youtu.be/815s-YB9X44 Integration by Parts: The Basics] by James Sousa | [https://youtu.be/815s-YB9X44 Integration by Parts: The Basics] by James Sousa | ||
Revision as of 13:25, 6 October 2021
Continuing on the path of reversing derivative rules in order to make them useful for integration, we reverse the product rule.
Contents
Integration by parts
If where and are functions of , then
Rearranging,
Therefore,
Therefore,
or
This is the integration by parts formula. It is very useful in many integrals involving products of functions, as well as others.
For instance, to treat
we choose and . With these choices, we have and , and we have
Note that the choice of and was critical. Had we chosen the reverse, so that and , the result would have been
The resulting integral is no easier to work with than the original; we might say that this application of integration by parts took us in the wrong direction.
So the choice is important. One general guideline to help us make that choice is, if possible, to choose to be the factor of the integrand which becomes simpler when we differentiate it. In the last example, we see that does not become simpler when we differentiate it: is no simpler than .
An important feature of the integration by parts method is that we often need to apply it more than once. For instance, to integrate
we start by choosing and to get
Note that we still have an integral to take care of, and we do this by applying integration by parts again, with and , which gives us
So, two applications of integration by parts were necessary, owing to the power of in the integrand.
Note that any power of x does become simpler when we differentiate it, so when we see an integral of the form
one of our first thoughts ought to be to consider using integration by parts with . Of course, in order for it to work, we need to be able to write down an antiderivative for .
Example
Use integration by parts to evaluate the integral
Solution: If we let and , then we have and . Using our rule for integration by parts gives
We do not seem to have made much progress.
But if we integrate by parts again with and and hence and , we obtain
We may solve this identity to find the anti-derivative of and obtain
With definite integral
For definite integrals the rule is essentially the same, as long as we keep the endpoints.
Integration by parts for definite integrals Suppose f and g are differentiable and their derivatives are continuous. Then
- .
This can also be expressed in Leibniz notation.
More Examples
Examples Set 1: Integration by Parts
Exercises
Evaluate the following using integration by parts. Template:Question-answer
Template:Question-answer Template:Noprint
Resources
Videos
Integration by Parts: The Basics by James Sousa
Integration by Parts (After Integration by Parts Basics) by James Sousa
Integration by Parts - Additional Examples by James Sousa
Integration by Parts: The Basics by James Sousa
Deriving the Integration by Parts Formula - Easy! by patrickJMT
Integration by Parts Made Easy! by patrickJMT
Integration by Parts - Indefinite Integral by patrickJMT
Integration By Parts - Using IBP's Twice by patrickJMT
Integration by Parts - A Loopy Example! by patrickJMT
Integration by Parts - Definite Integral by patrickJMT
How does integration by parts work? by Krista King
Integration by Parts by Krista King
Integration by Parts Example 2 by Krista King
Integration by Parts Example 3 by Krista King
Integration by Parts Example 4 by Krista King