Difference between revisions of "Real Numbers:Rational"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "thumb|The rational numbers (<math>\mathbb{Q}</math>) are included in the [[real numbers (<math>\mathbb{R}</math>), while themselves including the [...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Number-systems.svg|thumb|The rational numbers (<math>\mathbb{Q}</math>) are included in the [[real numbers]] (<math>\mathbb{R}</math>), while themselves including the [[integers]] (<math>\mathbb{Z}</math>), which in turn include the [[natural numbers]] (<math>\mathbb{N}</math>)]]
+
[[File:Number-systems.svg|thumb|The rational numbers (<math>\mathbb{Q}</math>) are included in the real numbers (<math>\mathbb{R}</math>), while themselves including the integers (<math>\mathbb{Z}</math>), which in turn include the natural numbers (<math>\mathbb{N}</math>)]]
  
In [[mathematics]], a '''rational number''' is a [[number]] that can be expressed as the [[quotient]] or [[fraction (mathematics)|fraction]] {{math|{{sfrac|''p''|''q''}}}} of two [[integer]]s, a [[numerator]] {{math|''p''}} and a non-zero [[denominator]] {{math|''q''}}.<ref name="Rosen">{{cite book |last = Rosen |first=Kenneth |title=Discrete Mathematics and its Applications |edition=6th |publisher=McGraw-Hill |location=New York, NY|isbn=978-0-07-288008-3 |pages=105, 158–160}}</ref> For example, {{math|{{sfrac|−3|7}}}} is a rational number, as is every integer (e.g. {{math|5 {{=}} {{sfrac|5|1}}}}). The [[set (mathematics)|set]] of all rational numbers, also referred to as "'''the rationals'''",<ref>{{cite book |title=Elements of Pure and Applied Mathematics |edition=illustrated |first1=Harry |last1=Lass |publisher=Courier Corporation |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-486-47186-0 |page=382 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WAY_AwAAQBAJ}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=WAY_AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA382 Extract of page 382]</ref> the '''field of rationals'''<ref>{{cite book |title=The Collected Works of Julia Robinson |first1=Julia |last1=Robinson |publisher=American Mathematical Soc |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-8218-0575-6 |page=104 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_33D84OENIAC}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=_33D84OENIAC&pg=PA104 Extract of page 104]</ref> or the '''field of rational numbers''' is usually denoted by a boldface {{math|'''Q'''}} (or [[blackboard bold]] <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>, Unicode {{unichar|1D410|MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL Q}} or {{unichar|211A|DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL Q}});<ref>{{cite web|last1=Rouse|first1=Margaret|title=Mathematical Symbols|url=http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/definition/Mathematical-Symbols|access-date=1 April 2015}}</ref> it was thus denoted in 1895 by [[Giuseppe Peano]] after ''[[wikt:quoziente|quoziente]]'', Italian for "[[quotient]]",{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}} and first appeared in Bourbaki's ''Algèbre''.<ref name=":0" />
+
In mathematics, a '''rational number''' is a number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction <math>\frac{p}{q}</math> of two integers, a numerator {{math|''p''}} and a non-zero denominator {{math|''q''}}. For example, <math>\frac{-3}{7}</math> is a rational number, as is every integer (e.g. <math>5=\frac{5}{1}</math>). The set of all rational numbers, also referred to as "'''the rationals'''", the '''field of rationals''' or the '''field of rational numbers''' is usually denoted by a boldface {{math|'''Q'''}} (or blackboard bold <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>); it was thus denoted in 1895 by Giuseppe Peano after ''quoziente'', Italian for "quotient", and first appeared in Bourbaki's ''Algèbre''.
  
The [[decimal expansion]] of a rational number either terminates after a finite number of [[numerical digit|digits]] (example: {{math|{{sfrac|3|4}} {{=}} 0.75}}), or eventually begins to [[repeating decimal|repeat]] the same finite [[sequence]] of digits over and over (example: {{math|{{sfrac|9|44}} {{=}} 0.20454545...}}).<ref>{{Cite web|title=Rational number|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/rational-number|access-date=2020-08-11|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en}}</ref> Conversely, any repeating or terminating decimal represents a rational number. These statements are true in [[decimal|base 10]], and in every other integer [[radix|base]] (for example, [[binary numeral system|binary]] or [[hexadecimal]]).{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}
+
The decimal expansion of a rational number either terminates after a finite number of digits (example: <math>\frac{3}{4} = 0.75</math>), or eventually begins to repeat the same finite sequence of digits over and over (example: <math>\frac{9}{44} = 0.20454545</math>...). Conversely, any repeating or terminating decimal represents a rational number. These statements are true in base 10, and in every other integer base (for example, binary or hexadecimal).
  
A [[real number]] that is not rational is called [[irrational number|irrational]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Weisstein|first=Eric W.|title=Rational Number|url=https://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalNumber.html|access-date=2020-08-11|website=mathworld.wolfram.com|language=en}}</ref> Irrational numbers include {{math|[[square root of 2|{{sqrt|2}}]]}}, [[Pi|{{pi}}]], {{math|[[E (mathematical constant)|''e'']]}}, and {{math|[[Golden ratio|''φ'']]}}. The [[decimal expansion]] of an irrational number continues without repeating. Since the set of rational numbers is [[countable set|countable]], and the set of real numbers is [[uncountable set|uncountable]], [[almost all]] real numbers are irrational.<ref name="Rosen"/>
+
A real number that is not rational is called irrational. Irrational numbers include <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>\pi</math>, <math>e</math>, and {{math|''φ''}}. The decimal expansion of an irrational number continues without repeating. Since the set of rational numbers is countable, and the set of real numbers is uncountable, almost all real numbers are irrational.
  
Rational numbers can be [[Formalism (mathematics)|formally]] defined as [[equivalence class]]es of pairs of integers {{math|(''p'', ''q'')}} with {{math|''q'' ≠ 0}}, using the [[equivalence relation]] defined as follows:
+
Rational numbers can be formally defined as equivalence classes of pairs of integers {{math|(''p'', ''q'')}} with {{math|''q'' ≠ 0}}, using the equivalence relation defined as follows:
 
: <math>\left( p_1, q_1 \right) \sim \left( p_2, q_2 \right) \iff p_1 q_2 = p_2 q_1.</math>
 
: <math>\left( p_1, q_1 \right) \sim \left( p_2, q_2 \right) \iff p_1 q_2 = p_2 q_1.</math>
The fraction {{math|{{sfrac|''p''|''q''}}}} then denotes the equivalence class of {{math|(''p'', ''q'')}}.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|last=Biggs|first=Norman L.|title=Discrete Mathematics|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2002|isbn=978-0-19-871369-2|location=India|pages=75-78}}</ref>
+
The fraction <math>\frac{p}{q}</math> then denotes the equivalence class of {{math|(''p'', ''q'')}}.
  
Rational numbers together with [[addition]] and [[multiplication]] form a [[field (mathematics)|field]] which contains the [[integer]]s, and is contained in any field containing the integers. In other words, the field of rational numbers is a [[prime field]], and a field has [[characteristic zero]] if and only if it contains the rational numbers as a subfield. Finite [[field extension|extensions]] of {{math|'''Q'''}} are called [[algebraic number field]]s, and the [[algebraic closure]] of {{math|'''Q'''}} is the field of [[algebraic number]]s.<ref name="Gilbert">{{cite book |last1=Gilbert |first1=Jimmie |last2=Linda |first2=Gilbert|author2-link=Linda Gilbert Saucier |year=2005 |title=Elements of Modern Algebra |edition=6th |publisher=Thomson Brooks/Cole |location=Belmont, CA |isbn=0-534-40264-X |pages=243–244}}</ref>
+
Rational numbers together with addition and multiplication form a field which contains the integers, and is contained in any field containing the integers. In other words, the field of rational numbers is a prime field, and a field has characteristic zero if and only if it contains the rational numbers as a subfield. Finite extensions of {{math|'''Q'''}} are called algebraic number fields, and the algebraic closure of {{math|'''Q'''}} is the field of algebraic numbers.
  
In [[mathematical analysis]], the rational numbers form a [[dense set|dense subset]] of the real numbers. The real numbers can be constructed from the rational numbers by [[completion (metric space)|completion]], using [[Cauchy sequence]]s, [[Dedekind cut]]s, or infinite [[decimal]]s (for more, see [[Construction of the real numbers]]).{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}
+
In mathematical analysis, the rational numbers form a dense subset of the real numbers. The real numbers can be constructed from the rational numbers by completion, using Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts, or infinite decimals (for more, see Construction of the real numbers).
 +
 
 +
==Terminology==
 +
The term ''rational'' in reference to the set {{math|'''Q'''}} refers to the fact that a rational number represents a ''ratio'' of two integers. In mathematics, "rational" is often used as a noun abbreviating "rational number". The adjective ''rational'' sometimes means that the coefficients are rational numbers. For example, a rational point is a point with rational coordinates (i.e., a point whose coordinates are rational numbers); a ''rational matrix'' is a matrix of rational numbers; a ''rational polynomial'' may be a polynomial with rational coefficients, although the term "polynomial over the rationals" is generally preferred, to avoid confusion between "rational expression" and "rational function" (a polynomial is a rational expression and defines a rational function, even if its coefficients are not rational numbers). However, a rational curve ''is not'' a curve defined over the rationals, but a curve which can be parameterized by rational functions.
 +
 
 +
===Etymology===
 +
 
 +
Although nowadays ''rational numbers'' are defined in terms of ''ratios'', the term ''rational'' is not a derivation of ''ratio''. On the opposite, it is ''ratio'' that is derived from ''rational'': the first use of ''ratio'' with its modern meaning was attested in English about 1660, while the use of ''rational'' for qualifying numbers appeared almost a century earlier, in 1570. This meaning of ''rational'' came from the mathematical meaning of ''irrational'', which was first used in 1551, and it was used in "translations of Euclid (following his peculiar use of ἄλογος)".
 +
 
 +
This unusual history originated in the fact that ancient Greeks "avoided heresy by forbidding themselves from thinking of those irrationa lengths as numbers". So such lengths were ''irrational'', in the sense of ''illogical'', that is "not to be spoken about" (ἄλογος in Greek).
 +
 
 +
This etymology is similar to that of ''imaginary'' numbers and ''real'' numbers.
  
 
==Arithmetic==
 
==Arithmetic==
{{See also|Fraction (mathematics)#Arithmetic with fractions}}
 
  
 
===Irreducible fraction===
 
===Irreducible fraction===
Every rational number may be expressed in a unique way as an [[irreducible fraction]] {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}}, where {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are [[coprime integers]] and {{math|''b'' > 0}}. This is often called the [[canonical form]] of the rational number.
+
Every rational number may be expressed in a unique way as an irreducible fraction <math>\frac{a}{b}</math>, where {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are coprime integers and {{math|''b'' > 0}}. This is often called the canonical form of the rational number.
  
Starting from a rational number {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}}, its canonical form may be obtained by dividing {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} by their [[greatest common divisor]], and, if {{math|''b'' < 0}}, changing the sign of the resulting numerator and denominator.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}
+
Starting from a rational number <math>\frac{a}{b}</math>, its canonical form may be obtained by dividing {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} by their greatest common divisor, and, if {{math|''b'' < 0}}, changing the sign of the resulting numerator and denominator.
  
 
===Embedding of integers===
 
===Embedding of integers===
Any integer {{math|''n''}} can be expressed as the rational number {{math|{{sfrac|''n''|1}}}}, which is its canonical form as a rational number.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}
+
Any integer {{math|''n''}} can be expressed as the rational number <math>\frac{n}{1}</math>, which is its canonical form as a rational number.
  
 
===Equality===
 
===Equality===
Line 30: Line 40:
  
 
If both fractions are in canonical form, then:  
 
If both fractions are in canonical form, then:  
:<math>\frac{a}{b} = \frac{c}{d}</math> if and only if <math>a = c</math> and <math>b = d</math><ref name=":1" />
+
:<math>\frac{a}{b} = \frac{c}{d}</math> if and only if <math>a = c</math> and <math>b = d</math>
<!--Examples:
 
:<math>\frac{1}{3} = \frac{2}{6}</math>
 
:<math>\frac{-1}{2} = \frac{1}{-2}</math>
 
:<math>\frac{0}{1} = \frac{0}{2}</math>-->
 
  
 
===Ordering===
 
===Ordering===
Line 40: Line 46:
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} < \frac{c}{d}</math> if and only if <math>ad < bc.</math>
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} < \frac{c}{d}</math> if and only if <math>ad < bc.</math>
  
On the other hand, if either denominator is negative, then each fraction with a negative denominator must first be converted into an equivalent form with a positive denominator—by changing the signs of both its numerator and denominator.<ref name=":1" />
+
On the other hand, if either denominator is negative, then each fraction with a negative denominator must first be converted into an equivalent form with a positive denominator—by changing the signs of both its numerator and denominator.
  
 
===Addition===
 
===Addition===
Line 46: Line 52:
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} + \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ad+bc}{bd}.</math>
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} + \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ad+bc}{bd}.</math>
  
If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if {{mvar|b}} and {{mvar|d}} are [[coprime integers]].<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Fraction - Encyclopedia of Mathematics|url=https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/Fraction|access-date=2021-08-17|website=encyclopediaofmath.org}}</ref>
+
If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if {{mvar|b}} and {{mvar|d}} are coprime integers.
  
 
===Subtraction===
 
===Subtraction===
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} - \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ad-bc}{bd}.</math>
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} - \frac{c}{d} = \frac{ad-bc}{bd}.</math>
  
If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if {{mvar|b}} and {{mvar|d}} are [[coprime integers]].<ref name=":2" />{{Verify source|date=August 2021}}
+
If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if {{mvar|b}} and {{mvar|d}} are coprime integers.
  
 
===Multiplication===
 
===Multiplication===
Line 57: Line 63:
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} \cdot\frac{c}{d} = \frac{ac}{bd}.</math>
 
:<math>\frac{a}{b} \cdot\frac{c}{d} = \frac{ac}{bd}.</math>
  
where the result may be a [[reducible fraction]]—even if both original fractions are in canonical form.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
+
where the result may be a reducible fraction—even if both original fractions are in canonical form.
  
 
===Inverse===
 
===Inverse===
Every rational number {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} has an [[additive inverse]], often called its ''opposite'',
+
Every rational number <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> has an additive inverse, often called its ''opposite'',
 
:<math> - \left( \frac{a}{b} \right) = \frac{-a}{b}.</math>
 
:<math> - \left( \frac{a}{b} \right) = \frac{-a}{b}.</math>
If {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} is in canonical form, the same is true for its opposite.
+
If <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> is in canonical form, the same is true for its opposite.
  
A nonzero rational number {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} has a [[multiplicative inverse]], also called its ''reciprocal'',
+
A nonzero rational number <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> has a multiplicative inverse, also called its ''reciprocal'',
 
:<math> \left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-1} = \frac{b}{a}. </math>
 
:<math> \left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-1} = \frac{b}{a}. </math>
If {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} is in canonical form, then the canonical form of its reciprocal is either {{math|{{sfrac|''b''|''a''}}}} or {{math|{{sfrac|−''b''|−''a''}}}}, depending on the sign of {{mvar|a}}.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}
+
If <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> is in canonical form, then the canonical form of its reciprocal is either <math>\frac{b}{a}</math> or <math>\frac{-b}{-a}</math>, depending on the sign of {{mvar|a}}.
  
 
===Division===
 
===Division===
Line 72: Line 78:
 
:<math>\frac{\frac{a}{b}} {\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{ad}{bc}.</math>
 
:<math>\frac{\frac{a}{b}} {\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{ad}{bc}.</math>
  
Thus, dividing {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} by {{math|{{sfrac|''c''|''d''}}}} is equivalent to multiplying {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} by the [[multiplicative inverse|reciprocal]] of {{math|{{sfrac|''c''|''d''}}}}:
+
Thus, dividing <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> by <math>\frac{c}{d}</math> is equivalent to multiplying <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> by the reciprocal of <math>\frac{c}{d}</math>:
:<math>\frac{ad}{bc} = \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{d}{c}.</math><ref name=":2" />{{Verify source|date=August 2021}}
+
:<math>\frac{ad}{bc} = \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{d}{c}.</math>
  
 
===Exponentiation to integer power===
 
===Exponentiation to integer power===
 
If {{math|''n''}} is a non-negative integer, then
 
If {{math|''n''}} is a non-negative integer, then
 
:<math>\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^n = \frac{a^n}{b^n}.</math>
 
:<math>\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^n = \frac{a^n}{b^n}.</math>
The result is in canonical form if the same is true for {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}}. In particular,  
+
The result is in canonical form if the same is true for <math>\frac{a}{b}</math>. In particular,  
 
:<math>\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^0 = 1.</math>
 
:<math>\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^0 = 1.</math>
  
 
If {{math|''a'' ≠ 0}}, then
 
If {{math|''a'' ≠ 0}}, then
 
:<math>\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-n} = \frac{b^n}{a^n}.</math>
 
:<math>\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^{-n} = \frac{b^n}{a^n}.</math>
If {{math|{{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}} is in canonical form, the canonical form of the result is {{math|{{sfrac|''b<sup>n</sup>''|''a<sup>n</sup>''}}}} if {{math|''a'' > 0}} or {{mvar|n}} is even. Otherwise, the canonical form of the result is {{math|{{sfrac|−''b<sup>n</sup>''|−''a<sup>n</sup>''}}}}.{{Citation needed|date=August 2021}}
+
If <math>\frac{a}{b}</math> is in canonical form, the canonical form of the result is <math>\frac{b^n}{a^n}</math> if {{math|''a'' > 0}} or {{mvar|n}} is even. Otherwise, the canonical form of the result is <math>\frac{-b^n}{-a^n}</math>.
  
 
==Formal construction==
 
==Formal construction==
 
[[File:Rational Representation.svg|thumb|right|300px|A diagram showing a representation of the equivalent classes of pairs of integers]]
 
[[File:Rational Representation.svg|thumb|right|300px|A diagram showing a representation of the equivalent classes of pairs of integers]]
The rational numbers may be built as [[equivalence class]]es of [[ordered pair]]s of [[integer]]s.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
+
The rational numbers may be built as equivalence classes of ordered pairs of integers.
  
More precisely, let {{math|('''Z''' × ('''Z''' \ {0}))}} be the set of the pairs {{math|(''m'', ''n'')}} of integers such {{math|''n'' ≠ 0}}. An [[equivalence relation]] is defined on this set by  
+
More precisely, let {{math|('''Z''' × ('''Z''' \ {0}))}} be the set of the pairs {{math|(''m'', ''n'')}} of integers such {{math|''n'' ≠ 0}}. An equivalence relation is defined on this set by  
: <math>\left(m_1, n_1 \right) \sim \left(m_2, n_2 \right) \iff m_1 n_2 = m_2 n_1.</math><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
+
: <math>\left(m_1, n_1 \right) \sim \left(m_2, n_2 \right) \iff m_1 n_2 = m_2 n_1.</math>
  
 
Addition and multiplication can be defined by the following rules:
 
Addition and multiplication can be defined by the following rules:
 
:<math>\left(m_1, n_1\right) + \left(m_2, n_2\right) \equiv \left(m_1n_2 + n_1m_2, n_1n_2\right),</math>
 
:<math>\left(m_1, n_1\right) + \left(m_2, n_2\right) \equiv \left(m_1n_2 + n_1m_2, n_1n_2\right),</math>
:<math>\left(m_1, n_1\right) \times \left(m_2, n_2\right) \equiv \left(m_1m_2, n_1n_2\right).</math><ref name=":1" />
+
:<math>\left(m_1, n_1\right) \times \left(m_2, n_2\right) \equiv \left(m_1m_2, n_1n_2\right).</math>
  
This equivalence relation is a [[congruence relation]], which means that it is compatible with the addition and multiplication defined above; the set of rational numbers {{math|'''Q'''}} is the defined as the [[quotient set]] by this equivalence relation, {{math|1=('''Z''' × ('''Z''' \ {0})) / ~}}, equipped with the addition and the multiplication induced by the above operations. (This construction can be carried out with any [[integral domain]] and produces its [[field of fractions]].)<ref name=":1" />
+
This equivalence relation is a congruence relation, which means that it is compatible with the addition and multiplication defined above; the set of rational numbers {{math|'''Q'''}} is the defined as the quotient set by this equivalence relation, {{math|1=('''Z''' × ('''Z''' \ {0})) / ~}}, equipped with the addition and the multiplication induced by the above operations. (This construction can be carried out with any integral domain and produces its field of fractions.)
  
The equivalence class of a pair {{math|(''m'', ''n'')}} is denoted {{math|{{sfrac|''m''|''n''}}}}.   
+
The equivalence class of a pair {{math|(''m'', ''n'')}} is denoted <math>\frac{m}{n}</math>.   
Two pairs {{math|(''m''<sub>1</sub>, ''n''<sub>1</sub>)}} and {{math|(''m''<sub>2</sub>, ''n''<sub>2</sub>)}} belong to the same equivalence class (that is are equivalent) if and only if {{math|''m''<sub>1</sub>''n''<sub>2</sub> {{=}} ''m''<sub>2</sub>''n''<sub>1</sub>}}. This means that {{math|{{sfrac|''m''<sub>1</sub>|''n''<sub>1</sub>}} {{=}} {{sfrac|''m''<sub>2</sub>|''n''<sub>2</sub>}}}} if and only {{math|''m''<sub>1</sub>''n''<sub>2</sub> {{=}} ''m''<sub>2</sub>''n''<sub>1</sub>}}.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
+
Two pairs {{math|(''m''<sub>1</sub>, ''n''<sub>1</sub>)}} and {{math|(''m''<sub>2</sub>, ''n''<sub>2</sub>)}} belong to the same equivalence class (that is are equivalent) if and only if {{math|''m''<sub>1</sub>''n''<sub>2</sub>}} = {{math|''m''<sub>2</sub>''n''<sub>1</sub>}}. This means that <math>\frac{m_1}{n_1}</math> = <math>\frac{m_2}{n_2}</math> if and only {{math|''m''<sub>1</sub>''n''<sub>2</sub>}} = {{math|''m''<sub>2</sub>''n''<sub>1</sub>}}.
  
Every equivalence class {{math|{{sfrac|''m''|''n''}}}} may be represented by infinitely many pairs, since
+
 
 +
Every equivalence class <math>\frac{m}{n}</math> may be represented by infinitely many pairs, since
 
:<math>\cdots  = \frac{-2m}{-2n} = \frac{-m}{-n} = \frac{m}{n} = \frac{2m}{2n} = \cdots.</math>
 
:<math>\cdots  = \frac{-2m}{-2n} = \frac{-m}{-n} = \frac{m}{n} = \frac{2m}{2n} = \cdots.</math>
Each equivalence class contains a unique ''[[representative (mathematics)|canonical representative element]]''. The canonical representative is the unique pair {{math|(''m'', ''n'')}} in the equivalence class such that {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}} are [[coprime]], and {{math|''n'' > 0}}. It is called the [[irreducible fraction|representation in lowest terms]] of the rational number.
+
Each equivalence class contains a unique ''canonical representative element''. The canonical representative is the unique pair {{math|(''m'', ''n'')}} in the equivalence class such that {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}} are coprime, and {{math|''n'' > 0}}. It is called the representation in lowest terms of the rational number.
  
The integers may be considered to be rational numbers identifying the integer {{mvar|n}} with the rational number {{math|{{sfrac|''n''|1}}}}.
+
The integers may be considered to be rational numbers identifying the integer {{mvar|n}} with the rational number <math>\frac{n}{1}</math>.
  
A [[total order]] may be defined on the rational numbers, that extends the natural order of the integers. One has
+
A total order may be defined on the rational numbers, that extends the natural order of the integers. One has
 
:<math>\frac{m_1}{n_1} \le \frac{m_2}{n_2}</math>
 
:<math>\frac{m_1}{n_1} \le \frac{m_2}{n_2}</math>
 
if
 
if
 
:<math>(n_1n_2 > 0 \quad \text{and} \quad m_1n_2 \le n_1m_2)\qquad \text{or}\qquad (n_1n_2 < 0 \quad \text{and} \quad m_1n_2 \ge n_1m_2).</math>
 
:<math>(n_1n_2 > 0 \quad \text{and} \quad m_1n_2 \le n_1m_2)\qquad \text{or}\qquad (n_1n_2 < 0 \quad \text{and} \quad m_1n_2 \ge n_1m_2).</math>
 +
 +
==Properties==
 +
[[File:Diagonal argument.svg|thumb|right|200px|Illustration of the countability of the positive rationals]]
 +
The set {{math|'''Q'''}} of all rational numbers, together with the addition and multiplication operations shown above, forms a field.
 +
 +
{{math|'''Q'''}} has no field automorphism other than the identity.
 +
 +
With the order defined above, {{math|'''Q'''}} is an ordered field that has no subfield other than itself, and is the smallest ordered field, in the sense that every ordered field contains a unique subfield isomorphic to {{math|'''Q'''}}.
 +
 +
{{math|'''Q'''}} is a prime field, which is a field that has no subfield other than itself. The rationals are the smallest field with characteristic zero. Every field of characteristic zero contains a unique subfield isomorphic to {{math|'''Q'''}}.
 +
 +
{{math|'''Q'''}} is the field of fractions of the integers {{math|'''Z'''}}. The algebraic closure of {{math|'''Q'''}}, i.e. the field of roots of rational polynomials, is the field of algebraic numbers.
 +
 +
The set of all rational numbers is countable (see the figure), while the set of all real numbers (as well as the set of irrational numbers) is uncountable. Being countable, the set of rational numbers is a null set, that is, almost all real numbers are irrational, in the sense of Lebesgue measure.
 +
 +
The rationals are a densely ordered set: between any two rationals, there sits another one, and, therefore, infinitely many other ones. For example, for any two fractions such that
 +
:<math>\frac{a}{b} < \frac{c}{d}</math>
 +
(where <math>b,d</math> are positive), we have
 +
:<math>\frac{a}{b} < \frac{a + c}{b + d} < \frac{c}{d}.</math>
 +
 +
Any totally ordered set which is countable, dense (in the above sense), and has no least or greatest element is order isomorphic to the rational numbers.
 +
 +
==Real numbers and topological properties==
 +
The rationals are a dense subset of the real numbers: every real number has rational numbers arbitrarily close to it. A related property is that rational numbers are the only numbers with finite expansions as regular continued fractions.
 +
 +
By virtue of their order, the rationals carry an order topology. The rational numbers, as a subspace of the real numbers, also carry a subspace topology. The rational numbers form a metric space by using the absolute difference metric {{math|''d''(''x'', ''y'')}} = |''x'' − ''y''|, and this yields a third topology on {{math|'''Q'''}}. All three topologies coincide and turn the rationals into a topological field. The rational numbers are an important example of a space which is not locally compact. The rationals are characterized topologically as the unique countable metrizable space without isolated points. The space is also totally disconnected. The rational numbers do not form a complete metric space; the real numbers are the completion of {{math|'''Q'''}} under the metric {{math|''d''(''x'', ''y'')}} = |''x'' − ''y''| above.
 +
 +
==Resources==
 +
# Rosen, Kenneth. Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 105, 158–160. ISBN 978-0-07-288008-3.
 +
# Lass, Harry (2009). Elements of Pure and Applied Mathematics (illustrated ed.). Courier Corporation. p. 382. ISBN 978-0-486-47186-0. Extract of page 382
 +
# Robinson, Julia (1996). The Collected Works of Julia Robinson. American Mathematical Soc. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-8218-0575-6. Extract of page 104
 +
# Rouse, Margaret. "Mathematical Symbols". Retrieved 1 April 2015.
 +
# Weisstein, Eric W. "Rational Number". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
 +
# "Rational number". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
 +
# Biggs, Norman L. (2002). Discrete Mathematics. India: Oxford University Press. pp. 75–78. ISBN 978-0-19-871369-2.
 +
# Gilbert, Jimmie; Linda, Gilbert (2005). Elements of Modern Algebra (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. pp. 243–244. ISBN 0-534-40264-X.
 +
# Shor, Peter (2017-05-09). "Does rational come from ratio or ratio come from rational". Stack Exchange. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
 +
# Coolman, Robert (2016-01-29). "How a Mathematical Superstition Stultified Algebra for Over a Thousand Years". Retrieved 2021-03-20.
 +
# Kramer, Edna (1983). The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics. Princeton University Press. p. 28.
 +
# "Fraction - Encyclopedia of Mathematics". encyclopediaofmath.org. Retrieved 2021-08-17.
 +
# Sūgakkai, Nihon (1993). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, Volume 1. London, England: MIT Press. p. 578. ISBN 0-2625-9020-4.
 +
# Bourbaki, N. (2003). Algebra II: Chapters 4 - 7. Springer Science & Business Media. p. A.VII.5.
 +
# Giese, Martin; Schönegge, Arno (December 1995). Any two countable densely ordered sets without endpoints are isomorphic - a formal proof with KIV (PDF) (Technical report). Retrieved 17 August 2021.
 +
# Weisstein, Eric W. "p-adic Number". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2021-08-17.
 +
 +
== Licensing ==
 +
Content obtained and/or adapted from:
 +
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_number Rational number, Wikipedia] under a CC BY-SA license

Latest revision as of 15:52, 21 October 2021

The rational numbers () are included in the real numbers (), while themselves including the integers (), which in turn include the natural numbers ()

In mathematics, a rational number is a number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q. For example, is a rational number, as is every integer (e.g. ). The set of all rational numbers, also referred to as "the rationals", the field of rationals or the field of rational numbers is usually denoted by a boldface Q (or blackboard bold ); it was thus denoted in 1895 by Giuseppe Peano after quoziente, Italian for "quotient", and first appeared in Bourbaki's Algèbre.

The decimal expansion of a rational number either terminates after a finite number of digits (example: ), or eventually begins to repeat the same finite sequence of digits over and over (example: ...). Conversely, any repeating or terminating decimal represents a rational number. These statements are true in base 10, and in every other integer base (for example, binary or hexadecimal).

A real number that is not rational is called irrational. Irrational numbers include , , , and φ. The decimal expansion of an irrational number continues without repeating. Since the set of rational numbers is countable, and the set of real numbers is uncountable, almost all real numbers are irrational.

Rational numbers can be formally defined as equivalence classes of pairs of integers (p, q) with q ≠ 0, using the equivalence relation defined as follows:

The fraction then denotes the equivalence class of (p, q).

Rational numbers together with addition and multiplication form a field which contains the integers, and is contained in any field containing the integers. In other words, the field of rational numbers is a prime field, and a field has characteristic zero if and only if it contains the rational numbers as a subfield. Finite extensions of Q are called algebraic number fields, and the algebraic closure of Q is the field of algebraic numbers.

In mathematical analysis, the rational numbers form a dense subset of the real numbers. The real numbers can be constructed from the rational numbers by completion, using Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts, or infinite decimals (for more, see Construction of the real numbers).

Terminology

The term rational in reference to the set Q refers to the fact that a rational number represents a ratio of two integers. In mathematics, "rational" is often used as a noun abbreviating "rational number". The adjective rational sometimes means that the coefficients are rational numbers. For example, a rational point is a point with rational coordinates (i.e., a point whose coordinates are rational numbers); a rational matrix is a matrix of rational numbers; a rational polynomial may be a polynomial with rational coefficients, although the term "polynomial over the rationals" is generally preferred, to avoid confusion between "rational expression" and "rational function" (a polynomial is a rational expression and defines a rational function, even if its coefficients are not rational numbers). However, a rational curve is not a curve defined over the rationals, but a curve which can be parameterized by rational functions.

Etymology

Although nowadays rational numbers are defined in terms of ratios, the term rational is not a derivation of ratio. On the opposite, it is ratio that is derived from rational: the first use of ratio with its modern meaning was attested in English about 1660, while the use of rational for qualifying numbers appeared almost a century earlier, in 1570. This meaning of rational came from the mathematical meaning of irrational, which was first used in 1551, and it was used in "translations of Euclid (following his peculiar use of ἄλογος)".

This unusual history originated in the fact that ancient Greeks "avoided heresy by forbidding themselves from thinking of those irrationa lengths as numbers". So such lengths were irrational, in the sense of illogical, that is "not to be spoken about" (ἄλογος in Greek).

This etymology is similar to that of imaginary numbers and real numbers.

Arithmetic

Irreducible fraction

Every rational number may be expressed in a unique way as an irreducible fraction , where a and b are coprime integers and b > 0. This is often called the canonical form of the rational number.

Starting from a rational number , its canonical form may be obtained by dividing a and b by their greatest common divisor, and, if b < 0, changing the sign of the resulting numerator and denominator.

Embedding of integers

Any integer n can be expressed as the rational number , which is its canonical form as a rational number.

Equality

if and only if

If both fractions are in canonical form, then:

if and only if and

Ordering

If both denominators are positive (particularly if both fractions are in canonical form):

if and only if

On the other hand, if either denominator is negative, then each fraction with a negative denominator must first be converted into an equivalent form with a positive denominator—by changing the signs of both its numerator and denominator.

Addition

Two fractions are added as follows:

If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if b and d are coprime integers.

Subtraction

If both fractions are in canonical form, the result is in canonical form if and only if b and d are coprime integers.

Multiplication

The rule for multiplication is:

where the result may be a reducible fraction—even if both original fractions are in canonical form.

Inverse

Every rational number has an additive inverse, often called its opposite,

If is in canonical form, the same is true for its opposite.

A nonzero rational number has a multiplicative inverse, also called its reciprocal,

If is in canonical form, then the canonical form of its reciprocal is either or , depending on the sign of a.

Division

If b, c, and d are nonzero, the division rule is

Thus, dividing by is equivalent to multiplying by the reciprocal of :

Exponentiation to integer power

If n is a non-negative integer, then

The result is in canonical form if the same is true for . In particular,

If a ≠ 0, then

If is in canonical form, the canonical form of the result is if a > 0 or n is even. Otherwise, the canonical form of the result is .

Formal construction

A diagram showing a representation of the equivalent classes of pairs of integers

The rational numbers may be built as equivalence classes of ordered pairs of integers.

More precisely, let (Z × (Z \ {0})) be the set of the pairs (m, n) of integers such n ≠ 0. An equivalence relation is defined on this set by

Addition and multiplication can be defined by the following rules:

This equivalence relation is a congruence relation, which means that it is compatible with the addition and multiplication defined above; the set of rational numbers Q is the defined as the quotient set by this equivalence relation, (Z × (Z \ {0})) / ~, equipped with the addition and the multiplication induced by the above operations. (This construction can be carried out with any integral domain and produces its field of fractions.)

The equivalence class of a pair (m, n) is denoted . Two pairs (m1, n1) and (m2, n2) belong to the same equivalence class (that is are equivalent) if and only if m1n2 = m2n1. This means that = if and only m1n2 = m2n1.


Every equivalence class may be represented by infinitely many pairs, since

Each equivalence class contains a unique canonical representative element. The canonical representative is the unique pair (m, n) in the equivalence class such that m and n are coprime, and n > 0. It is called the representation in lowest terms of the rational number.

The integers may be considered to be rational numbers identifying the integer n with the rational number .

A total order may be defined on the rational numbers, that extends the natural order of the integers. One has

if

Properties

Illustration of the countability of the positive rationals

The set Q of all rational numbers, together with the addition and multiplication operations shown above, forms a field.

Q has no field automorphism other than the identity.

With the order defined above, Q is an ordered field that has no subfield other than itself, and is the smallest ordered field, in the sense that every ordered field contains a unique subfield isomorphic to Q.

Q is a prime field, which is a field that has no subfield other than itself. The rationals are the smallest field with characteristic zero. Every field of characteristic zero contains a unique subfield isomorphic to Q.

Q is the field of fractions of the integers Z. The algebraic closure of Q, i.e. the field of roots of rational polynomials, is the field of algebraic numbers.

The set of all rational numbers is countable (see the figure), while the set of all real numbers (as well as the set of irrational numbers) is uncountable. Being countable, the set of rational numbers is a null set, that is, almost all real numbers are irrational, in the sense of Lebesgue measure.

The rationals are a densely ordered set: between any two rationals, there sits another one, and, therefore, infinitely many other ones. For example, for any two fractions such that

(where are positive), we have

Any totally ordered set which is countable, dense (in the above sense), and has no least or greatest element is order isomorphic to the rational numbers.

Real numbers and topological properties

The rationals are a dense subset of the real numbers: every real number has rational numbers arbitrarily close to it. A related property is that rational numbers are the only numbers with finite expansions as regular continued fractions.

By virtue of their order, the rationals carry an order topology. The rational numbers, as a subspace of the real numbers, also carry a subspace topology. The rational numbers form a metric space by using the absolute difference metric d(x, y) = |xy|, and this yields a third topology on Q. All three topologies coincide and turn the rationals into a topological field. The rational numbers are an important example of a space which is not locally compact. The rationals are characterized topologically as the unique countable metrizable space without isolated points. The space is also totally disconnected. The rational numbers do not form a complete metric space; the real numbers are the completion of Q under the metric d(x, y) = |xy| above.

Resources

  1. Rosen, Kenneth. Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 105, 158–160. ISBN 978-0-07-288008-3.
  2. Lass, Harry (2009). Elements of Pure and Applied Mathematics (illustrated ed.). Courier Corporation. p. 382. ISBN 978-0-486-47186-0. Extract of page 382
  3. Robinson, Julia (1996). The Collected Works of Julia Robinson. American Mathematical Soc. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-8218-0575-6. Extract of page 104
  4. Rouse, Margaret. "Mathematical Symbols". Retrieved 1 April 2015.
  5. Weisstein, Eric W. "Rational Number". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  6. "Rational number". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-08-11.
  7. Biggs, Norman L. (2002). Discrete Mathematics. India: Oxford University Press. pp. 75–78. ISBN 978-0-19-871369-2.
  8. Gilbert, Jimmie; Linda, Gilbert (2005). Elements of Modern Algebra (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. pp. 243–244. ISBN 0-534-40264-X.
  9. Shor, Peter (2017-05-09). "Does rational come from ratio or ratio come from rational". Stack Exchange. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
  10. Coolman, Robert (2016-01-29). "How a Mathematical Superstition Stultified Algebra for Over a Thousand Years". Retrieved 2021-03-20.
  11. Kramer, Edna (1983). The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics. Princeton University Press. p. 28.
  12. "Fraction - Encyclopedia of Mathematics". encyclopediaofmath.org. Retrieved 2021-08-17.
  13. Sūgakkai, Nihon (1993). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics, Volume 1. London, England: MIT Press. p. 578. ISBN 0-2625-9020-4.
  14. Bourbaki, N. (2003). Algebra II: Chapters 4 - 7. Springer Science & Business Media. p. A.VII.5.
  15. Giese, Martin; Schönegge, Arno (December 1995). Any two countable densely ordered sets without endpoints are isomorphic - a formal proof with KIV (PDF) (Technical report). Retrieved 17 August 2021.
  16. Weisstein, Eric W. "p-adic Number". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2021-08-17.

Licensing

Content obtained and/or adapted from: