Difference between revisions of "Compactness in Metric Spaces"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<p>Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.</p> | <p>Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.</p> | ||
<p>We also said that a subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F</math></span> is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> is an open covering) if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S</math></span> is also a cover of <span class="math-inline"><math>S</math></span>, that is:</p> | <p>We also said that a subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F</math></span> is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> is an open covering) if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S</math></span> is also a cover of <span class="math-inline"><math>S</math></span>, that is:</p> | ||
− | + | ||
− | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad S \subseteq \bigcup_{A \in \mathcal S} A \quad \text{ where } | + | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad S \subseteq \bigcup_{A \in \mathcal{S}} A \quad \text{where} \: \mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F \end{align}</math></div> |
<p>We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.</p> | <p>We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.</p> | ||
<blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> | <blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<p>Let <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* = \max \{ n_1, n_2, ..., n_p \}</math></span>. Then due to the nesting of the open covering <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span>, we see that:</p> | <p>Let <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* = \max \{ n_1, n_2, ..., n_p \}</math></span>. Then due to the nesting of the open covering <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span>, we see that:</p> | ||
<div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \bigcup_{k=1}^{p} \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n_p} \right ) = \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right ) \end{align}</math></div> | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \bigcup_{k=1}^{p} \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n_p} \right ) = \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right ) \end{align}</math></div> | ||
− | <p>But for <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1) \subseteq \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right )</math></span> we need <span class="math-inline"><math>1 \leq 1 - \frac{1}{n^*}</math></span>. But <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* \in \mathbb{N}</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* | + | <p>But for <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1) \subseteq \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right )</math></span> we need <span class="math-inline"><math>1 \leq 1 - \frac{1}{n^*}</math></span>. But <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* \in \mathbb{N}</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* > 0</math></span> and <span class="math-inline"><math>\frac{1}{n^*} > 0</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>1 - \frac{1}{n^*} < 1</math></span>. Therefore any finite subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F^*</math></span> of <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> cannot cover <span class="math-inline"><math>S = (0, 1)</math></span>. Hence, <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1)</math></span> is not compact.</p> |
Revision as of 15:41, 8 November 2021
Compact Sets in a Metric Space
If is a metric space and then a cover or covering of is a collection of subsets in such that:
Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.
We also said that a subset is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if is an open covering) if is also a cover of , that is:
We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.
Definition: Let be a metric space. The subset is said to be Compact if every open covering of has a finite subcovering of .
In general, it may be more difficult to show that a subset of a metric space is compact than to show a subset of a metric space is not compact. So, let's look at an example of a subset of a metric space that is not compact.
Consider the metric space where is the Euclidean metric and consider the set . We claim that this set is not compact. To show that is not compact, we need to find an open covering of that does not have a finite subcovering. Consider the following open covering:
Clearly is an infinite subcovering of and furthermore:
Let be a finite subset of containing elements. Then:
Let . Then due to the nesting of the open covering , we see that:
But for we need . But , so and , so . Therefore any finite subset of cannot cover . Hence, is not compact.