Difference between revisions of "Sequences and Their Limits"
(Created page with "Consider the sequence <math>\left \{ \frac{1}{n} \right \}_{n=1}^{\infty} = \left \{ 1, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{4}, ... \right \}</math>. As <math>n \to \infty</mat...") |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
We will now look at some important limit laws regarding sequences | We will now look at some important limit laws regarding sequences | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Limit Laws of Convergent Sequences== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will now look at some very important limit laws regarding convergent sequences, all of which are analogous to the limit laws for functions that we already know of. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *'''Law 1 (Addition Law of Convergent Sequences):''' If the limits of the sequences <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> are convergent, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n + b_n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n + \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = A + B</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*'''Proof of Law 1:''' Let <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> be convergent sequences. By the definition of a sequence being convergent, we know that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> for some <math>A, B \in \mathbb{R}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given, and recall that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon \exists N_1 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_1</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. Similarly, <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon \exists N_2 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_2</math> then <math>\mid b_n - B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*We will choose <math>N = \mathrm{max} \{ N_1, N_2 \}</math>. By choosing the larger of <math>N_1</math> and <math>N_2</math>, we ensure that the if <math>n \geq \mathrm{max} \{ N_1, N_2 \}</math>, then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math> and <math>\mid b_n - B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. We now want to show that if <math>n \geq N</math>, then <math>\mid (a_n + b_n) - (A + B) \mid < \epsilon</math>. By the triangle inequality we obtain that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \mid (a_n + b_n) - (A + B) \mid = \mid (a_n - A) + (b_n - B) \mid \leq \mid a_n + A \mid + \mid b_n + B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Therefore <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n + b_n) = A + B</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Law 2 (Difference Law of Convergent Sequences):''' If the limits of the sequences <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> are convergent, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n - b_n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n - \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = A - B</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :* '''Proof of Law 2:''' Let <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> be convergent sequences. By the definition of a sequence being convergent, we know that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> for some <math>A, B \in \mathbb{R}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given, and recall that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon \exists N_1 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_1</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. Similarly, <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon \exists N_2 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_2</math> then <math>\mid b_n - B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*We will choose <math>N = \mathrm{max} \{ N_1, N_2 \}</math>. By choosing the larger of <math>N_1</math> and <math>N_2</math>, we ensure that the if <math>n \geq \mathrm{max} \{ N_1, N_2 \}</math>, then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math> and <math>\mid b_n - B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. We now want to show that if <math>n \geq N</math>, then <math>\mid (a_n - b_n) - (A - B) \mid < \epsilon</math>. By the triangle inequality we obtain that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \mid (a_n - b_n) - (A - B) \mid = \mid (a_n - A) + (B - b_n) \mid \leq \mid a_n + A \mid + \mid B - b_n \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Therefore <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n - b_n) = A - B</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *'''Law 3 (Product Law of Convergent Sequences):''' If the limits of the sequences <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> are convergent, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math>, then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_nb_n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n \cdot \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = AB</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*'''Proof of Law 3:''' Let <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> be convergent sequences. Since <math>\{ a_n \}</math> is convergent, it is also bounded, that is there exists <math>M \geq 0</math> such that <math>\mid a_n \mid < M</math>. Now we note that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N_1 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_1</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{\mathrm{max} \{ \mid b \mid, 1 \}} < \epsilon</math>. Similarly, <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N_2 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_2</math> then <math>\mid b_n - B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2 \mathrm{max} \{M, 1\}} < \epsilon</math>. Note that these choices seem rather abstract, but will make more sense subsequently in the proof. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now we want to show that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>\mid a_nb_n - AB \mid < \epsilon</math>. Choose <math>N = \mathrm{max} \{ N_1, N_2 \}</math> so that both <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{\mathrm{max} \{ \mid b \mid, 1 \}}</math> and <math>\mid b_n - B \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2 \mathrm{max} \{M, 1\}}</math> hold. With some algebraic manipulation and the triangle inequality, we obtain that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \mid a_nb_n - AB \mid = \mid a_n(b_n - B) + B(a_n - A) \mid \leq \mid a_n \mid \mid b_n - B \mid + \mid B \mid \mid a_n - A \mid \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*And making the appropriate substitutions we get that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \mid a_nb_n - AB \mid \leq \mid a_n \mid \mid b_n - B \mid + \mid B \mid \mid a_n - A \mid < M \frac{\epsilon}{2 \mathrm{max} \{M, 1\}} + \mid b \mid \frac{\epsilon}{2\mathrm{max} \{ \mid b \mid, 1 \}} < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Therefore <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_nb_n) = AB</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *'''Law 4 (Quotient Law of Convergent Sequences):''' If the limits of the sequences <math>\{ a_n \}</math> and <math>\{ b_n \}</math> are convergent, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math>, then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = \frac{\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n}{\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n} = \frac{A}{B}</math> provided that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n \neq 0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :* '''Proof of Law 4:''' Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given. We want to shown that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math>, then <math>\mid \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \mid < \epsilon</math>. Doing some algebraic manipulation and using the triangle inequality, we get: | ||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \bigg| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| = \bigg| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{b_n} + \frac{A}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| = \bigg| \frac{a_n - A}{b_n} + \frac{A}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| = \bigg| \frac{a_n - A}{b_n} + (B - b_n) \cdot \frac{A}{B \cdot b_n} \bigg| \leq \bigg| \frac{a_n - A}{b_n} \bigg| + \bigg| (B - b_n) \cdot \frac{A}{B \cdot b_n} \bigg| \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Doing some more work, we obtain that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \bigg| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| \leq \frac{\mid a_n - A\mid }{\mid b_n \mid} + \bigg| \frac{A}{B} \bigg| \cdot \frac{\mid B - b_n \mid}{\mid b_n \mid} \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*We note that since <math>\{ b_n \}</math> is convergent to the limit <math>B</math>, at some point <math>\mid b_n \mid > \frac{\mid B \mid}{2}</math> which implies that <math>\frac{1}{\mid b_n \mid} < \frac{2}{\mid B \mid}</math>. Therefore: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \bigg| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| \leq ... < \frac{2}{\mid B \mid} \mid a_n - A\mid + \bigg| \frac{2A}{B^2} \bigg| \cdot \mid B - b_n \mid \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N_1 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_1</math> then <math>\mid a_n + A \mid < \frac{\mid B \mid \epsilon}{4}</math> to ensure that <math>\mid a_n - A \mid \cdot \frac{2}{\mid B \mid} < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Similarly, <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N_2 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_2</math> then <math>\mid b_n + B \mid < \bigg| \frac{B^2}{4A} \bigg| \epsilon</math> to ensure that <math>\mid b_n - B \mid \bigg| \frac{2A}{B^2} \bigg| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now choose <math>N = \mathrm{max} \{ N_1, N_2 \}</math> so that <math>\mid a_n + A \mid < \frac{\mid B \mid \epsilon}{4} < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math> and <math>\mid b_n + B \mid < \bigg| \frac{2A}{B^2} \bigg| \epsilon < \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math>, and therefore: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \bigg| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| \leq ... < \frac{2}{\mid B \mid} \mid a_n - A\mid + \bigg| \frac{2A}{B^2} \bigg| \cdot \mid B - b_n \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Therefore for <math>n \geq N</math>, <math>\bigg| \frac{a_n}{b_n} - \frac{A}{B} \bigg| < \epsilon</math>, so <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = \frac{A}{B}</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Law 5 (Constant Multiple Law of Convergent Sequences):''' If the limit of the sequence <math>\{ a_n \}</math> is convergent, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math>, and <math>k</math> is a constant, then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} ka_n = k \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = kA</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*'''Proof of Law 5:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Let <math>k</math></span> be a constant such that <math>k \neq 0</math>. We note that the case that <math>k = 0</math></span> is trivial since then <math>\lim_{n\ \to \infty} 0a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} 0 = 0</math>. Let <math>\{ a_n \}</math> be a convergent sequence so that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> which implies that <math>\forall \epsilon \exists N_1 \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_1</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{\mid k \mid}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given. We want to show <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} ka_n = kA</math>, that is, <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math></span> then <math>\mid k_an - kA \mid < \epsilon</math>. Working with this inequality: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \mid k a_n - kA \mid = \mid k(a_n - A) \mid = \mid k \mid \mid a_n - A \mid < \epsilon \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*We choose <math>N = N_1</math> and therefore if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \frac{\epsilon}{\mid k \mid}</math> and so <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} ka_n = kA</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *'''Law 6 (Power Law of Convergent Sequences):''' If the limit of the sequence <math>\{ a_n \}</math> is convergent, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math> and <math>k</math> is a non-negative integer, then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n)^k = \left ( \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n \right )^k = (A)^k</math> provided that <math>k \in \mathbb{N}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*'''Proof of Law 6:''' Recall that from the power law for sequences that if <span class="math-inline"><math>\{ a_n \}</math></span> and <span class="math-inline"><math>\{ b_n \}</math></span> are convergent sequences such that <span class="math-inline"><math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = A</math></span> and <span class="math-inline"><math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = B</math></span>, then <span class="math-inline"><math>\lim_{n \to \infty} [a_n b_n] = AB</math></span>. The power law is just a special case of this. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Consider <math>\{ b_n \} = \{ a_n \}</math> and therefore by the power law <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} [a_n a_n] = \lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n)^2 = AA = A^2</math>. Therefore <math>\{ a_n^2 \}</math> is a convergent sequence. Now continue to the process by letting <math>\{b_n \} = \{ a_n \}^2</math> and therefore <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n a_n^2 = AA^2 = A^3</math>, etc… so we deduce if <math>\{ a_n \}</math> is convergent then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} (a_n)^k = A^k</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Law 7 (Squeeze Theorem for Convergent Sequences):''' If the limits of the sequences <math>\{ a_n \}</math>, <math>\{ b_n \}</math>, and <math>\{ c_n \}</math> are convergent and <math>a_n \leq b_n \leq c_n</math> is true always after some <math>n^{\mathrm{th}}</math> term, if <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} c_n = L</math>, then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = L</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*'''Proof of Law 7:''' Let <math>\{ a_n \}</math>, <math>\{ b_n \}</math> and <math>\{ c_n \}</math> be convergent sequences such that <math>a_n \leq b_n \leq c_n</math> is true always after some <math>M^{\mathrm{th}}</math> term, and let <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} c_n = L</math>. We want to show that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> then ><math>\mid b_n - L \mid < \epsilon</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*We note that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = L</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N_1</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_1</math> then <math>\mid a_n - L \mid < \epsilon</math> or rather, <math>-\epsilon < a_n - L < \epsilon</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Similarly we note that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} c_n = L</math> implies that <math>\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N_2</math> such that if <math>n \geq N_2</math> then <math>\mid c_n - L \mid < \epsilon</math> or rather <math>-\epsilon < c_n - L < \epsilon</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :*Now let <math>N = \mathrm{max} \{ M, N_1, N_2 \}</math> to ensure that <math>-\epsilon < a_n - L < \epsilon</math>, <math>-\epsilon < c_n - L \epsilon</math>, and <math>a_n \leq b_n \leq c_n</math>. Subtracting <math>L</math> from all parts of this inequality we get that <math>a_n - L \leq b_n - L \leq c_n - L</math> or rather <math>-\epsilon < b_n - L < \epsilon</math> so then <math>\mid b_n - L \mid < \epsilon</math> and thus <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = L</math>. ><math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Example 1== | ||
+ | '''Determine whether the sequence <math>\left \{ \frac{x^2 - 1}{x + 1} \right \}_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> is convergent or divergent.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>f(n) = \frac{n^2 - 1}{n + 1}</math> be a function analogous to our sequence. When we factor the numerator and cancel like-terms, we get that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} f(n) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n^2 - 1}{n + 1} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{(n +1)(n - 1)}{n + 1} = \lim_{n \to \infty} n - 1 = \infty</math>. Therefore the sequence <math>\left \{ \frac{x^2 - 1}{x + 1} \right \}_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> is divergent. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Licensing == | ||
+ | Content obtained and/or adapted from: | ||
+ | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/limit-of-a-sequence Limit of a Sequence, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license | ||
+ | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/limit-sum-difference-laws-for-convergent-sequences#toc1 Limit Sum/Difference Laws for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license | ||
+ | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/limit-product-quotient-laws-for-convergent-sequences#toc1 Limit Product/Quotient Laws for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license | ||
+ | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/limit-constant-multiple-power-laws-for-convergent-sequences#toc2 Limit Constant Multiple/Power Laws for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license | ||
+ | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-squeeze-theorem-for-convergent-sequences The Squeeze Theorem for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 21 November 2021
Consider the sequence . As , it appears as though . In fact, we know that this is true since . We will now formalize the definition of a limit with regards to sequences.
- Definition: If is a sequence, then means that for every there exists a corresponding such that if , then . If this limit exists, then we say that the sequence Converges, and if this limit doesn't exist then we say say the sequence Diverges.
We note that our definition of the limit of a sequence is very similar to the limit of a function, in fact, we can think of a sequence as a function whose domain is the set of natural numbers . From this notion, we obtain the very important theorem:
- Theorem 1: If is a sequence and a function , then if where and , then .
- Proof of Theorem 1: Let be given. We know that which implies that such that if then .
- Now we want to show that such that if then . We will choose . This ensures that is an integer.
- Now since then it follows that if then . But and so so .
- Important Note: The converse of this theorem is not implied to be true! That is if and , then this does NOT imply that . For example, consider the sequence . Clearly this sequence converges at 0. However, the function does not converge, instead, it diverges as it oscillates between and .
For example, consider the sequence . If we let be a function whose domain is the natural numbers, then we calculate the limit of this function like we have in the past, namely:
Therefore the limit of our sequence is 1, that is, converges to 1 as .
Now let's look at another major theorem.
- Theorem 2: If and a function is continuous at , then .
- Proof of Theorem 2: If is a continuous function at , then we know that is defined and that . By the definition of a limit, such that if then . Let so then if then .
- We want to show that , that is such that if then , which is what we showed above.
We will now look at some important limit laws regarding sequences
Limit Laws of Convergent Sequences
We will now look at some very important limit laws regarding convergent sequences, all of which are analogous to the limit laws for functions that we already know of.
- Law 1 (Addition Law of Convergent Sequences): If the limits of the sequences and are convergent, that is and then .
- Proof of Law 1: Let and be convergent sequences. By the definition of a sequence being convergent, we know that and for some .
- Now let be given, and recall that implies that such that if then . Similarly, implies that such that if then .
- We will choose . By choosing the larger of and , we ensure that the if , then and . We now want to show that if , then . By the triangle inequality we obtain that:
- Therefore .
- Law 2 (Difference Law of Convergent Sequences): If the limits of the sequences and are convergent, that is and then .
- Proof of Law 2: Let and be convergent sequences. By the definition of a sequence being convergent, we know that and for some .
- Now let be given, and recall that implies that such that if then . Similarly, implies that such that if then .
- We will choose . By choosing the larger of and , we ensure that the if , then and . We now want to show that if , then . By the triangle inequality we obtain that:
- Therefore .
- Law 3 (Product Law of Convergent Sequences): If the limits of the sequences and are convergent, that is and , then .
- Proof of Law 3: Let and be convergent sequences. Since is convergent, it is also bounded, that is there exists such that . Now we note that implies that such that if then . Similarly, implies that such that if then . Note that these choices seem rather abstract, but will make more sense subsequently in the proof.
- Now we want to show that such that if then . Choose so that both and hold. With some algebraic manipulation and the triangle inequality, we obtain that:
- And making the appropriate substitutions we get that:
- Therefore .
- Law 4 (Quotient Law of Convergent Sequences): If the limits of the sequences and are convergent, that is and , then provided that .
- Proof of Law 4: Let be given. We want to shown that such that if , then . Doing some algebraic manipulation and using the triangle inequality, we get:
- Doing some more work, we obtain that:
- We note that since is convergent to the limit , at some point which implies that . Therefore:
- Now implies that such that if then to ensure that .
- Similarly, implies that such that if then to ensure that .
- Now choose so that and , and therefore:
- Therefore for , , so .
- Law 5 (Constant Multiple Law of Convergent Sequences): If the limit of the sequence is convergent, that is , and is a constant, then .
- Proof of Law 5:
- Let be a constant such that . We note that the case that is trivial since then . Let be a convergent sequence so that which implies that such that if then .
- Now let be given. We want to show , that is, such that if then . Working with this inequality:
- We choose and therefore if then and so .
- Law 6 (Power Law of Convergent Sequences): If the limit of the sequence is convergent, that is and is a non-negative integer, then provided that .
- Proof of Law 6: Recall that from the power law for sequences that if and are convergent sequences such that and , then . The power law is just a special case of this.
- Consider and therefore by the power law . Therefore is a convergent sequence. Now continue to the process by letting and therefore , etc… so we deduce if is convergent then .
- Law 7 (Squeeze Theorem for Convergent Sequences): If the limits of the sequences , , and are convergent and is true always after some term, if , then .
- Proof of Law 7: Let , and be convergent sequences such that is true always after some term, and let . We want to show that such that if then >.
- We note that implies that such that if then or rather, .
- Similarly we note that implies that such that if then or rather .
- Now let to ensure that , , and . Subtracting from all parts of this inequality we get that or rather so then and thus . >
Example 1
Determine whether the sequence is convergent or divergent.
Let be a function analogous to our sequence. When we factor the numerator and cancel like-terms, we get that . Therefore the sequence is divergent.
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from:
- Limit of a Sequence, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license
- Limit Sum/Difference Laws for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license
- Limit Product/Quotient Laws for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license
- Limit Constant Multiple/Power Laws for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license
- The Squeeze Theorem for Convergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license