Difference between revisions of "Proofs:Biconditionals"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A biconditional of two propositions P and Q takes the form "<math> P </math> if and only if <math> Q </math>". This can also be written as "<math> P \iff Q </math>, which is e...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A biconditional of two propositions P and Q takes the form "<math> P </math> if and only if <math> Q </math>". This can also be written as "<math> P \iff Q </math>, which is equivalent to "<math> P \implies Q </math> and <math> Q \implies P </math>"
+
A biconditional of two propositions P and Q takes the form " <math> P </math> if and only if <math> Q </math> ". This can also be written as <math> P \iff Q </math>, which is equivalent to <math> P \implies Q \and Q \implies P </math>. When proving a biconditional statement, we need to prove that <math> P \implies Q </math> and <math> Q \implies P </math> are true. Remember that the contrapositive of a conditional is logically equivalent to the conditional. Thus, " <math> P \implies Q </math> and <math> Q \implies P </math> " is logically equivalent to " <math> P \implies Q </math> and <math> \neg P \implies \neg Q </math> ", " <math> Q \implies P </math> and <math> \neg Q \implies \neg P </math> ", or " <math> \neg P \implies \neg Q </math> and <math> \neg Q \implies \neg P </math> ". Thus, we do have some options as to how to prove the two directions of a biconditional statement.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Example of a biconditional proof: "For <math> x\in\Z, 3x + 3 </math> is odd if and only if <math> x </math> is even". Let <math> P </math> = "3x + 3 is odd" and <math> Q </math> = "x is even".
 +
 
 +
: If x is even, then 3x + 3 = 3(2k) + 3 for some integer k. 3(2k) + 3 = 3(2k + 1). 3 is odd and 2k+1 is odd, so their product is also odd. Thus, if x is even, 3x + 3 is odd. Therefore, the statement <math> Q \implies P </math> is true.
 +
 
 +
: If x is odd, then 3x + 3 = 3(2k + 1) + 3 for some integer k. 3(2k + 1) + 3 = 3(2k + 1 + 1) = 3(2k + 2) = 3(2)(k+1). Thus 3x + 3 is a multiple of 2 and is even if x is odd. So, the statement <math> \neg Q \implies \neg P </math>, which is logically equivalent to <math> P \implies Q </math>, is true.
 +
 
 +
Therefore, <math> P \iff Q </math>.
 +
 
 +
==Resources==
 +
* [https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/A_Spiral_Workbook_for_Discrete_Mathematics_(Kwong)/02%3A_Logic/2.04%3A_Biconditional_Statements Biconditional Statements], Mathematics LibreTexts
 +
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_biconditional Logical Biconditional], Wikipedia

Latest revision as of 11:45, 24 September 2021

A biconditional of two propositions P and Q takes the form " if and only if ". This can also be written as , which is equivalent to . When proving a biconditional statement, we need to prove that and are true. Remember that the contrapositive of a conditional is logically equivalent to the conditional. Thus, " and " is logically equivalent to " and ", " and ", or " and ". Thus, we do have some options as to how to prove the two directions of a biconditional statement.


Example of a biconditional proof: "For is odd if and only if is even". Let = "3x + 3 is odd" and = "x is even".

If x is even, then 3x + 3 = 3(2k) + 3 for some integer k. 3(2k) + 3 = 3(2k + 1). 3 is odd and 2k+1 is odd, so their product is also odd. Thus, if x is even, 3x + 3 is odd. Therefore, the statement is true.
If x is odd, then 3x + 3 = 3(2k + 1) + 3 for some integer k. 3(2k + 1) + 3 = 3(2k + 1 + 1) = 3(2k + 2) = 3(2)(k+1). Thus 3x + 3 is a multiple of 2 and is even if x is odd. So, the statement , which is logically equivalent to , is true.

Therefore, .

Resources