Difference between revisions of "Separation of Variables"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 70: Line 70:
  
 
*[https://youtu.be/Vc6MwLVdCuM Solving a Separable Differential Equation, Another Example #2] by patrickJMT
 
*[https://youtu.be/Vc6MwLVdCuM Solving a Separable Differential Equation, Another Example #2] by patrickJMT
 +
 +
==Licensing==
 +
Content obtained and/or adapted from:
 +
* [https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ordinary_Differential_Equations/Separable_equations:_Separation_of_variables Separation of Variables, Wikibooks: Ordinary Differential Equations/Separable equations] under a CC BY-SA license

Latest revision as of 11:14, 29 October 2021

Definition

A separable ODE is an equation of the form

for some functions , . In this chapter, we shall only be concerned with the case .

We often write for this ODE

for short, omitting the argument of .

[Note that the term "separable" comes from the fact that an important class of differential equations has the form

for some ; hence, a separable ODE is one of these equations, where we can "split" the as .]

Informal derivation of the solution

Using Leibniz' notation for the derivative, we obtain an informal derivation of the solution of separable ODEs, which serves as a good mnemonic.

Let a separable ODE

be given. Using Leibniz notation, it becomes

.

We now formally multiply both sides by and divide both sides by to obtain

.

Integrating this equation yields

.

Define

;

this shall mean that is a primitive of . If then is invertible, we get

,

where is a primitive of ; that is, , now inserting the variable of back into the notation.

Now the formulae in this derivation don't actually mean anything; it's only a formal derivation. But below, we will prove that it actually yields the right result.

General solution

Theorem 2.1:
Let a separable, one-dimensional ODE
be given, where is never zero. Let be an antiderivative of and an antiderivative of . If is invertible, the function
solves the ODE under consideration.

Proof:

By the inverse and chain rules,

;

since is never zero, the fraction occuring above involving is well-defined.

Resources

Licensing

Content obtained and/or adapted from: