|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 30: |
Line 30: |
| </ul> | | </ul> |
| | | |
− | <math>\begin{align} \quad W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n) \right|_{t_0} \neq 0 \end{align}</math> | + | <math>\begin{align} \quad W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n) \bigg|_{t_0} \neq 0 \end{align}</math> |
| <ul> | | <ul> |
| <li>Thus this implies that following system of equations have only trivial solution <math>k_1 = k_2 = ... = k_n = 0</math>:</li> | | <li>Thus this implies that following system of equations have only trivial solution <math>k_1 = k_2 = ... = k_n = 0</math>:</li> |
Line 40: |
Line 40: |
| </ul> | | </ul> |
| <ul> | | <ul> |
− | <li><math>\Leftarrow</math> We will prove the converse of Theorem 1 by contradiction. Suppose that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent on <math>I</math>, and assume that instead <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> do NOT form a fundamental set of solutions on <math>I</math>. Then for some <math>t_0 \in I</math>, the Wronskian <math>W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n) \right|_{t_0} = 0</math>. Thus the system of equations above does not have only the trivial solution. Let the constants <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, …, <math>k_n^*</math> be a nontrivial solution to this system. Define <math>\phi(t)</math> as:</li> | + | <li><math>\Leftarrow</math> We will prove the converse of Theorem 1 by contradiction. Suppose that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent on <math>I</math>, and assume that instead <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> do NOT form a fundamental set of solutions on <math>I</math>. Then for some <math>t_0 \in I</math>, the Wronskian <math>W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n) \bigg|_{t_0} = 0</math>. Thus the system of equations above does not have only the trivial solution. Let the constants <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, …, <math>k_n^*</math> be a nontrivial solution to this system. Define <math>\phi(t)</math> as:</li> |
| </ul> | | </ul> |
| | | |
Line 55: |
Line 55: |
| <li>But <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent which implies that <math>k_1^* = k_2^* = ... = k_n^* = 0</math>. Thus <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, …, <math>k_n^*</math> is a trivial solution to the system above, which is a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> do not form a fundamental set of solutions was false. <math>\blacksquare</math></li> | | <li>But <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent which implies that <math>k_1^* = k_2^* = ... = k_n^* = 0</math>. Thus <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, …, <math>k_n^*</math> is a trivial solution to the system above, which is a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, …, <math>y_n</math> do not form a fundamental set of solutions was false. <math>\blacksquare</math></li> |
| </ul> | | </ul> |
| + | |
| + | ==Licensing== |
| + | Content obtained and/or adapted from: |
| + | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/linear-independence-dependence-of-a-set-of-functions Linear Independence Dependence of a Set of Functions, http://mathonline.wikidot.com/] under a CC BY-SA license |
If we have an order linear homogenous differential equation where , , …, are continuous on an open interval and if , , …, are solutions to this differential equation, then provided that for at least one point , then , , …, form a fundamental set of solutions to this differential equation - that is, for constants , , …, , then every solution to this differential equation can be written in the form:
We will now look at the connection between the solutions , , …, forming a fundamental set of solutions and the linear independence/dependence of such solutions. We first define linear independence and linear dependence below.
Definition: The functions , , …, are said to be Linearly Independent on an interval if for constants , , …, we have that implies that for all . This set of functions is said to be Linearly Dependent if where , , …, are not all zero for all .
Perhaps the simplest linearly independent sets of functions is that set that contains , , and . Let , , and be constants and consider the following equation:
It's not hard to see that equation above is satisfied if and only if the constants .
For another example, consider the functions and defined on all of . This set of functions is not linearly independent. To show this, let and be constants and consider the following equation:
Now choose . Then we have that:
But the above equation is true for any choice of constants and since , and thus and do not form a linearly independent set on all of .
From the concept of linear independence/dependence, we obtain the following theorem on fundamental sets of solutions for order linear homogenous differential equations.
Theorem 1: Let be an order linear homogenous differential equation. If , , …, are solutions to this differential equation then , , …, form a fundamental set of solutions to this differential equation on the open interval if and only if , , …, are linearly dependent on .
- Proof: Consider the following order linear homogenous differential equation:
- Suppose that , , …, form a fundamental set of solutions to this differential equation on the open interval . Then this implies that for all we have that :
- Thus this implies that following system of equations have only trivial solution :
- Thus the equation implies that . Thus , , …, are linearly independent on .
- We will prove the converse of Theorem 1 by contradiction. Suppose that , , …, are linearly independent on , and assume that instead , , …, do NOT form a fundamental set of solutions on . Then for some , the Wronskian . Thus the system of equations above does not have only the trivial solution. Let the constants , , …, be a nontrivial solution to this system. Define as:
- Note that satisfies the initial conditions , , …, , and satisfies our order linear homogenous differential equation because is a linear combination of the solutions , , …, .
- Now note that the function also satisfies the differential equation and the initial conditions. By the existence/uniqueness theorem for order linear homogenous differential equations, this implies that for all , so:
- But , , …, are linearly independent which implies that . Thus , , …, is a trivial solution to the system above, which is a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that , , …, do not form a fundamental set of solutions was false.
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: