Difference between revisions of "Properly Divergent Sequences"
(Created page with "Recall that a sequence <math>(a_n)</math> of real numbers is said to be <strong>convergent</strong> to the real number <math>A</math> if <math>\forall \epsilon > 0</math> ther...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
Recall that a sequence <math>(a_n)</math> of real numbers is said to be <strong>convergent</strong> to the real number <math>A</math> if <math>\forall \epsilon > 0</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \epsilon</math>. | Recall that a sequence <math>(a_n)</math> of real numbers is said to be <strong>convergent</strong> to the real number <math>A</math> if <math>\forall \epsilon > 0</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>\mid a_n - A \mid < \epsilon</math>. | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
*'''Proof:''' Suppose that <math>(a_n)</math> and <math>(b_n)</math> are convergent sequences and that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = L</math> for <math>L \in \mathbb{R}</math> and <math>L > 0</math>. Then for <math>\epsilon = \frac{L}{2} > 0</math> we have that for some <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>\mid \frac{a_n}{b_n} - L \mid < \frac{L}{2}</math> or equivalently: | *'''Proof:''' Suppose that <math>(a_n)</math> and <math>(b_n)</math> are convergent sequences and that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = L</math> for <math>L \in \mathbb{R}</math> and <math>L > 0</math>. Then for <math>\epsilon = \frac{L}{2} > 0</math> we have that for some <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>\mid \frac{a_n}{b_n} - L \mid < \frac{L}{2}</math> or equivalently: | ||
+ | <div style="text-align: center;"> <math> \begin{align} \frac{L}{2} < \frac{a_n}{b_n} < \frac{3L}{2} \\ \frac{L}{2}b_n < a_n < \frac{3L}{2}b_n \\ \end{align}</math></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | If <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \infty</math> then since <math>a_n < \frac{3L}{2} b_n</math> it follows that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = \infty</math>. Similarly if <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = \infty</math> then since <math>\frac{L}{2} b_n < a_n</math> it follows that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \infty</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> | ||
+ | '''Theorem 5:''' If <math>(a_n)</math> is a properly divergent subsequence then there exists no convergent subsequences <math>(a_{n_k})</math> of <math>(a_n)</math>. | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Proof:''' We will first deal with the case where <math>(a_n)</math> is properly divergent to <math>\infty</math>. Suppose instead that there exists a subsequence <math>(a_{n_k})</math> that converges to <math>L</math>. Then <math>\forall \epsilon > 0</math> <math>\exists K \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>k \geq K</math> then <math>\mid a_{n_k} - L \mid < \epsilon</math>, and so for <math>k \geq K</math> then <math>L - \epsilon < a_{n_k} < L + \epsilon</math>, and so <math>a_{n_k} < L + \epsilon</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Now if <math>(a_n)</math> diverges to <math>\infty</math> then for <math>L + \epsilon \in \mathbb{R}</math> <math>\exists N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>a_n > L + \epsilon</math>. So for <math>n_k \geq \mathrm{max} \{ K, N \}</math>, we have that <math>L + \epsilon < a_{n_k} < L + \epsilon</math> which is a contradiction. So our assumption that <math>(a_{n_k})</math> converges was false, and so there exists no convergent subsequences <math>(a_{n_k})</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Example 1=== | ||
+ | '''Show that the sequence <math>(n^2)</math> is properly divergent to <math>\infty</math>.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | We want to show that <math>\forall M \in \mathbb{R}</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> then <math>n^2 > M</math>. Notice that <math>n^2 > n</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>. By the Archimedean property, since <math>M \in \mathbb{R}</math> there exists an <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that <math>M \leq n</math>, and so <math>n^2 > n \geq M</math>. Therefore the sequence <math>(n^2)</math> diverges properly to <math>\infty</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Licensing == | ||
+ | Content obtained and/or adapted from: | ||
+ | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/properly-divergent-sequences Properly Divergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
Latest revision as of 15:48, 7 November 2021
Recall that a sequence of real numbers is said to be convergent to the real number if there exists an such that if then .
If we negate this statement we have that a sequence of real numbers is divergent if then such that such that if then . However, there are different types of divergent sequences. For example, a sequence can alternate between different points and be divergent such as the sequence , or instead, the sequence can tend to infinity such as or negative infinity such as , or neither, such as . We will now define properly divergent sequences.
Definition: A sequence of real numbers is said to be Properly Divergent to if , that is there exists an such that if then . Similarly, is said to be Properly Divergent to if , that is there exists an such that if then .
Now let's look at some theorems regarding properly divergent sequences.
Theorem 1: An increasing sequence of real numbers is properly divergent to if it is unbounded. A decreasing sequence of real numbers is properly divergent to if it is unbounded.
- Proof: Suppose that is a sequence of real numbers that is increasing. Since is unbounded, then for any there exists a term (dependent on ) such that . Since is an increasing sequence, then for we have that and since is arbitrary we have that .
- Similarly suppose that is a sequence of real numbers that is decreasing. Since is unbounded, then for any there exists a term (dependent on such that . Since is a decreasing sequence, then for we have that and since is arbitrary we have that .
Theorem 2: Let and be sequences of real numbers such that for all . Then if then .
- Proof: Let and be sequences of real numbers such that for all , and let . Then it follows that for all that there exists an (dependent on such that if then . But we have that for all and so for we have that . Since is arbitrary it follows that .
Theorem 3: Let and be sequences of real numbers such that for all . Then if then .
- Proof: Let and be sequences of real numbers such that for all , and let . Then it follows that for all that there exists an (dependent on such that if then . But we have that for all and so for we have that . Since is arbitrary it follows that .
Theorem 4: If and are sequences of positive real numbers suppose that for some real number that . Then if and only if .
- Proof: Suppose that and are convergent sequences and that for and . Then for we have that for some if then or equivalently:
If then since it follows that . Similarly if then since it follows that .
Theorem 5: If is a properly divergent subsequence then there exists no convergent subsequences of .
- Proof: We will first deal with the case where is properly divergent to . Suppose instead that there exists a subsequence that converges to . Then such that if then , and so for then , and so .
- Now if diverges to then for such that if then . So for , we have that which is a contradiction. So our assumption that converges was false, and so there exists no convergent subsequences .
Example 1
Show that the sequence is properly divergent to .
We want to show that there exists an such that if then . Notice that for all . By the Archimedean property, since there exists an such that , and so . Therefore the sequence diverges properly to .
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from:
- Properly Divergent Sequences, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license