Difference between revisions of "Uniform Convergence of Series of Functions"
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><strong>Proof:</strong> <math>\Rightarrow</math> Suppose that <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is uniformly convergent to some limit function <math>f(x)</math> on <math>X</math>. Let <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that <math>\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty} s_n(x) = f(x)}</math> uniformly on <math>X</math>. So, for <math>\varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2}</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that:</li> | <li><strong>Proof:</strong> <math>\Rightarrow</math> Suppose that <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is uniformly convergent to some limit function <math>f(x)</math> on <math>X</math>. Let <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that <math>\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty} s_n(x) = f(x)}</math> uniformly on <math>X</math>. So, for <math>\varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2}</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that:</li> | ||
+ | |||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_n(x) - f(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math> | <math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_n(x) - f(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>For any <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math> let <math>m = n + p</math>. Then <math>m \geq N</math> and so:</li> | <li>For any <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math> let <math>m = n + p</math>. Then <math>m \geq N</math> and so:</li> | ||
+ | |||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| = \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| \leq \left| s_m(x) - f(x) \right| + \left| f(x) - s_n(x) \right| < \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2} = \varepsilon \end{align}</math> | <math>\begin{align} \quad \quad \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| = \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| \leq \left| s_m(x) - f(x) \right| + \left| f(x) - s_n(x) \right| < \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2} = \varepsilon \end{align}</math> | ||
Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
<li>Let <math>m, n \geq N</math>. Assume without loss of generality that <math>m > n</math> and that <math>m = n + p</math> for some <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math>. Then from above we see that for all <math>x \in X</math>:</li> | <li>Let <math>m, n \geq N</math>. Assume without loss of generality that <math>m > n</math> and that <math>m = n + p</math> for some <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math>. Then from above we see that for all <math>x \in X</math>:</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
<math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math> | <math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>So <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> converges uniformly on <math>X</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math></li> | <li>So <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> converges uniformly on <math>X</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math></li> | ||
+ | |||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Revision as of 13:53, 27 October 2021
Recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be pointwise convergent if for all and for all there exists an such that if then:
Also recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be uniformly convergent if for all there exists an such that if then for all we have that:
We will now extend the concept of pointwise convergence and uniform convergence to series of functions.
Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Pointwise Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums (where ) is pointwise convergent to .
For example, consider the following sequence of functions defined on the interval :
We now that this series converges pointwise for all since the result series is simply a geometric series to the sum function .
Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Uniformly Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is uniformly convergent to .
The geometric series given above actually converges uniformly on , though, showing this with the current definition of uniform convergence of series of functions is laborious. We will soon develop methods to determine whether a series of functions converges uniformly or not without having to brute-force apply the definition for uniform convergence for the sequence of partial sums.
Cauchy's Uniform Convergence Criterion for Series of Functions
If we have a sequence of functions with common domain then the corresponding series of functions is said to be uniformly convergent if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is a uniformly convergent sequence of functions.
We will now look at a nice theorem known as Cauchy's uniform convergence criterion for series of functions.
Theorem 1: Let be a sequence of real-valued functions with common domain . Then is uniformly convergent on if and only if for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that for all . |
- Proof: Suppose that is uniformly convergent to some limit function on . Let denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that uniformly on . So, for there exists an such that if and for all we have that:
- For any let . Then and so:
- Suppose that for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that:
- Let . Assume without loss of generality that and that for some . Then from above we see that for all :
- So converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So converges uniformly on .
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from:
- Pointwise Convergent and Uniformly Convergent Series of Functions, mathonline.wikidot.com under a CC BY-SA license