|
|
Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| ==Licensing== | | ==Licensing== |
| Content obtained and/or adapted from: | | Content obtained and/or adapted from: |
− | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/compact-sets-in-a-metric-space Compact Sets in a Metric Space] under a CC BY-SA license | + | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/compact-sets-in-a-metric-space Compact Sets in a Metric Space, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
Revision as of 15:44, 8 November 2021
Compact Sets in a Metric Space
If is a metric space and then a cover or covering of is a collection of subsets in such that:
Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.
We also said that a subset is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if is an open covering) if is also a cover of , that is:
We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.
Definition: Let be a metric space. The subset is said to be Compact if every open covering of has a finite subcovering of .
In general, it may be more difficult to show that a subset of a metric space is compact than to show a subset of a metric space is not compact. So, let's look at an example of a subset of a metric space that is not compact.
Consider the metric space where is the Euclidean metric and consider the set . We claim that this set is not compact. To show that is not compact, we need to find an open covering of that does not have a finite subcovering. Consider the following open covering:
Clearly is an infinite subcovering of and furthermore:
Let be a finite subset of containing elements. Then:
Let . Then due to the nesting of the open covering , we see that:
But for we need . But , so and , so . Therefore any finite subset of cannot cover . Hence, is not compact.
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: