Difference between revisions of "Natural Numbers:Postulates"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
In the area of mathematics called set theory, a specific construction defines the natural numbers as follows:
 
In the area of mathematics called set theory, a specific construction defines the natural numbers as follows:
* Set {{math|0 {{=}} {{mset| }}}}, the [[empty set]],
+
* Set <math>\O = \{\}</math>, the [[empty set]],
 
* Define {{math|''S''(''a'') {{=}} ''a'' ∪ {{mset|''a''}}}} for every set {{math|''a''}}. {{math|''S''(''a'')}} is the successor of {{math|''a''}}, and {{math|''S''}} is called the [[successor function]].
 
* Define {{math|''S''(''a'') {{=}} ''a'' ∪ {{mset|''a''}}}} for every set {{math|''a''}}. {{math|''S''(''a'')}} is the successor of {{math|''a''}}, and {{math|''S''}} is called the [[successor function]].
 
* By the [[axiom of infinity]], there exists a set which contains 0 and is closed under the successor function. Such sets are said to be  ''inductive''. The intersection of all such inductive sets is defined to be the set of natural numbers. It can be checked that the set of natural numbers satisfies the [[Peano axioms]].
 
* By the [[axiom of infinity]], there exists a set which contains 0 and is closed under the successor function. Such sets are said to be  ''inductive''. The intersection of all such inductive sets is defined to be the set of natural numbers. It can be checked that the set of natural numbers satisfies the [[Peano axioms]].
 
* It follows that each natural number is equal to the set of all natural numbers less than it:
 
* It follows that each natural number is equal to the set of all natural numbers less than it:
:*{{math|0 {{=}} {{mset| }}}},
+
: <math> 0 = \{ \} </math>,
:*{{math|1 {{=}} 0 ∪ {{mset|0}} {{=}} {{mset|0}} {{=}} {{mset|{{mset| }}}}}},
+
: <math> 1 = 0 \cup \{0\} = \{0\} = \{\{ \}\} </math>,
:*{{math|2 {{=}} 1 ∪ {{mset|1}} {{=}} {{mset|0, 1}} {{=}} {{mset|{{mset| }}, {{mset|{{mset| }}}}}}}},
+
: <math> 2 = 1 \cup \{1\} = \{0, 1\} = \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}\} </math>,
:*{{math|3 {{=}} 2 ∪ {{mset|2}} {{=}} {{mset|0, 1, 2}} {{=}} {{mset|{{mset| }}, {{mset|{{mset| }}}}, {{mset|{{mset| }}, {{mset|{{mset| }}}}}}}}}},
+
: <math> 3 = 2 \cup \{2\} = \{0, 1, 2\} = \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}, \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}\}\} </math>,
:*{{math|''n'' {{=}} ''n''−1 ∪ {{mset|''n''−1}} {{=}} {{mset|0, 1, ..., ''n''−1}} {{=}} {{mset|{{mset| }}, {{mset|{{mset| }}}}, ..., {{mset|{{mset| }}, {{mset|{{mset| }}}}, ...}}}}}}, etc.
+
: <math> n = n-1 \cup \{n−1\} = \{0, 1, ..., n-1\} = \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}, ..., \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}, ...\}\} </math>, etc.
  
 
With this definition, a natural number {{math|''n''}} is a particular set with {{math|''n''}} elements, and {{math|''n'' ≤ ''m''}} if and only if {{math|''n''}} is a [[subset]] of {{math|''m''}}. The standard definition, now called definition of '''von&nbsp;Neumann ordinals'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA-->, is: "each ordinal is the well-ordered set of all smaller ordinals."
 
With this definition, a natural number {{math|''n''}} is a particular set with {{math|''n''}} elements, and {{math|''n'' ≤ ''m''}} if and only if {{math|''n''}} is a [[subset]] of {{math|''m''}}. The standard definition, now called definition of '''von&nbsp;Neumann ordinals'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA-->, is: "each ordinal is the well-ordered set of all smaller ordinals."

Revision as of 12:48, 12 October 2021

Formal definitions

Many properties of the natural numbers can be derived from the five Peano axioms:

Peano's Axioms for the Natural Numbers

  1. 1 is a natural number.
  2. For every natural number , the successor to , (), is also a natural number.
  3. 1 is not a successor to any natural number.
  4. If two numbers and have the same successor, then .
  5. If a set contains 1, and also contains the successor of every element in , then every natural number is in .

These axioms are used to build the set of natural numbers . They are not the original axioms published by Peano, but are named in his honor. Some forms of the Peano axioms have 1 in place of 0. In ordinary arithmetic, the successor of is . Replacing axiom 5 by an axiom schema, one obtains a (weaker) first-order theory called Peano arithmetic.

Constructions based on set theory

Von Neumann ordinals

In the area of mathematics called set theory, a specific construction defines the natural numbers as follows:

  • Set , the empty set,
  • Define S(a) Template:= aTemplate:Mset for every set a. S(a) is the successor of a, and S is called the successor function.
  • By the axiom of infinity, there exists a set which contains 0 and is closed under the successor function. Such sets are said to be inductive. The intersection of all such inductive sets is defined to be the set of natural numbers. It can be checked that the set of natural numbers satisfies the Peano axioms.
  • It follows that each natural number is equal to the set of all natural numbers less than it:
,
,
,
,
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle n = n-1 \cup \{n−1\} = \{0, 1, ..., n-1\} = \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}, ..., \{\{ \}, \{\{ \}\}, ...\}\} } , etc.

With this definition, a natural number n is a particular set with n elements, and nm if and only if n is a subset of m. The standard definition, now called definition of von Neumann ordinals, is: "each ordinal is the well-ordered set of all smaller ordinals."

Also, with this definition, different possible interpretations of notations like n (n-tuples versus mappings of n into ) coincide.

Even if one does not accept the axiom of infinity and therefore cannot accept that the set of all natural numbers exists, it is still possible to define any one of these sets.

Zermelo ordinals

Although the standard construction is useful, it is not the only possible construction. Ernst Zermelo's construction goes as follows:[1]

Each natural number is then equal to the set containing just the natural number preceding it. This is the definition of Zermelo ordinals. Unlike von Neumann's construction, the Zermelo ordinals do not account for infinite ordinals.


Resources

  • Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Levy