Difference between revisions of "Lindelöf Theorem"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<p>For another example, consider the set of natural numbers <math>\mathbb{N}</math> with the discrete topology, i.e., every subset of <math>\mathbb{N}</math> is open. Then <math>\mathbb{N}</math> is not compact, because of the following open cover of <math>\mathbb{N}</math>:</p>
 
<p>For another example, consider the set of natural numbers <math>\mathbb{N}</math> with the discrete topology, i.e., every subset of <math>\mathbb{N}</math> is open. Then <math>\mathbb{N}</math> is not compact, because of the following open cover of <math>\mathbb{N}</math>:</p>
  
<math>\begin{align} \mathcal F = \{ \{n \} : n \in \mathbb{N} \} = \{ \{ 1 \}, \{ 2 \}, ..., \{ n \}, ... \} \end{align}</math>
+
<math>\begin{align} \quad \mathcal F = \{ \{n \} : n \in \mathbb{N} \} = \{ \{ 1 \}, \{ 2 \}, ..., \{ n \}, ... \} \end{align}</math>
  
 
<p>Clearly there does not exist any subcollection <math>\mathcal F^* \subseteq \mathcal F</math> that is finite and still covers <math>\mathbb{N}</math>! So <math>\mathbb{N}</math> is not compact.</p>
 
<p>Clearly there does not exist any subcollection <math>\mathcal F^* \subseteq \mathcal F</math> that is finite and still covers <math>\mathbb{N}</math>! So <math>\mathbb{N}</math> is not compact.</p>

Revision as of 12:55, 26 October 2021

Lindelöf and Countably Compact Topological Spaces

If is a topological space and , then is said to be compact in if every open cover of has a finite subcover.

Moreover, we said that is a compact topological space if every open cover of has a finite subcover.

We will now look at two similar definitions.

Definition: A topological space is said to be Lindelöf if every open cover of has a countable subcover. is said to be Countably Compact if every countable open cover of has a finite subcover.

It should be noted that the Lindelöf and countably compact property are weaker than the compactness property. If is a compact topological space then is also Lindelöf and countably compact.

For example, since is a compact topological space (with the subspace topology from the usual topology on ), then by extension, is both Lindelöf and countably compact.

Of course, there exists topological spaces which are not compact but are still Lindelöf or countably compact.

For another example, consider the set of natural numbers with the discrete topology, i.e., every subset of is open. Then is not compact, because of the following open cover of :

Clearly there does not exist any subcollection that is finite and still covers ! So is not compact.

However, is Lindelöf. To show this, let be any open cover of . Then we can choose a countable collection of sets from which also cover since each subset of has cardinality greater than or equal to .

Unfortunately, is not countably compact if we use the example open cover which showed that was not compact.

So as we can see, the concept of compactness, Lindelöfness, and countable compactness are different properties.