Difference between revisions of "Uniform Convergence of Series of Functions"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 32: Line 32:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><strong>Proof:</strong> <math>\Rightarrow</math> Suppose that <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is uniformly convergent to some limit function <math>f(x)</math> on <math>X</math>. Let <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that <math>\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty} s_n(x) = f(x)}</math> uniformly on <math>X</math>. So, for <math>\varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2}</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that:</li>
 
<li><strong>Proof:</strong> <math>\Rightarrow</math> Suppose that <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is uniformly convergent to some limit function <math>f(x)</math> on <math>X</math>. Let <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that <math>\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty} s_n(x) = f(x)}</math> uniformly on <math>X</math>. So, for <math>\varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2}</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that:</li>
 +
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_n(x) - f(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math>
 
<math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_n(x) - f(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>For any <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math> let <math>m = n + p</math>. Then <math>m \geq N</math> and so:</li>
 
<li>For any <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math> let <math>m = n + p</math>. Then <math>m \geq N</math> and so:</li>
 +
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<math>\begin{align} \quad \quad  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x)  \right| = \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| \leq \left| s_m(x) - f(x) \right| + \left| f(x) - s_n(x) \right| < \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2} = \varepsilon \end{align}</math>
 
<math>\begin{align} \quad \quad  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x)  \right| = \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| \leq \left| s_m(x) - f(x) \right| + \left| f(x) - s_n(x) \right| < \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_1 = \frac{\varepsilon}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon}{2} = \varepsilon \end{align}</math>
Line 46: Line 48:
 
<li>Let <math>m, n \geq N</math>. Assume without loss of generality that <math>m > n</math> and that <math>m = n + p</math> for some <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math>. Then from above we see that for all <math>x \in X</math>:</li>
 
<li>Let <math>m, n \geq N</math>. Assume without loss of generality that <math>m > n</math> and that <math>m = n + p</math> for some <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math>. Then from above we see that for all <math>x \in X</math>:</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 +
 
<math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math>
 
<math>\begin{align} \quad \left| s_m(x) - s_n(x) \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \varepsilon \end{align}</math>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>So <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> converges uniformly on <math>X</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math></li>
 
<li>So <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> converges uniformly on <math>X</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math></li>
 +
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  

Revision as of 13:53, 27 October 2021

Recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be pointwise convergent if for all and for all there exists an such that if then:

Also recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be uniformly convergent if for all there exists an such that if then for all we have that:

We will now extend the concept of pointwise convergence and uniform convergence to series of functions.

Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Pointwise Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums (where ) is pointwise convergent to .

For example, consider the following sequence of functions defined on the interval :

We now that this series converges pointwise for all since the result series is simply a geometric series to the sum function .

Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Uniformly Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is uniformly convergent to .

The geometric series given above actually converges uniformly on , though, showing this with the current definition of uniform convergence of series of functions is laborious. We will soon develop methods to determine whether a series of functions converges uniformly or not without having to brute-force apply the definition for uniform convergence for the sequence of partial sums.

Cauchy's Uniform Convergence Criterion for Series of Functions

If we have a sequence of functions with common domain then the corresponding series of functions is said to be uniformly convergent if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is a uniformly convergent sequence of functions.

We will now look at a nice theorem known as Cauchy's uniform convergence criterion for series of functions.

Theorem 1: Let be a sequence of real-valued functions with common domain . Then is uniformly convergent on if and only if for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that for all .
  • Proof: Suppose that is uniformly convergent to some limit function on . Let Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle (s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}} denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that uniformly on . So, for there exists an such that if and for all we have that:

  • For any let . Then and so:

  • Suppose that for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that:

  • Let . Assume without loss of generality that and that for some . Then from above we see that for all :

  • So converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So converges uniformly on Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle X} . Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \blacksquare}

Licensing

Content obtained and/or adapted from: