|
|
Line 72: |
Line 72: |
| ==Licensing== | | ==Licensing== |
| Content obtained and/or adapted from: | | Content obtained and/or adapted from: |
| + | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/dense-and-nowhere-dense-sets-in-a-topological-space Dense and Nowhere Dense Sets in a Topological Space, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
| + | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/sets-of-the-first-and-second-categories-in-a-topological-spa Sets of the First and Second Categories in a Topological Space, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
| * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-baire-category-theorem The Baire Category Theorem, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license | | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-baire-category-theorem The Baire Category Theorem, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
− | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/dense-and-nowhere-dense-sets-in-a-topological-space Dense and Nowhere Dense Sets in a Topological Space, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license
| |
Dense and Nowhere Dense Sets
Dense Sets in a Topological Space
Definition: Let
be a topological space. The set
is said to be Dense in
if the intersection of every nonempty open set with
is nonempty, that is,
for all
.
Given any topological space
it is important to note that
is dense in
because every
is such that
, and so
for all
.
For another example, consider the topological space
where
is the usual topology of open intervals. Then the set of rational numbers
is dense in
. If not, then there exists an
such that
.
Since
we have that
for some open interval
with
and
. Suppose that
. Then we must also have that:

The intersection above implies that there exists no rational numbers in the interval
, i.e., there exists no
such that
. But this is a contradiction since for all
with
there ALWAYS exists a rational number
such that
, i.e.,
. So
for all
. Thus,
is dense in
.
We will now look at a very important theorem which will give us a way to determine whether a set
is dense in
or not.
Theorem 1: Let
be a topological space and let
. Then
is dense in
if and only if
.
- Proof:
Suppose that
is dense in
. Then for all
we have that
. Clearly
so we only need to show that
.
Nowhere Dense Sets in a Topological Space
Definition: Let
be a topological space. A set
is said to be Nowhere Dense in
if the interior of the closure of
is empty, that is,
.
For example, consider the topological space
where
is the usually topology of open intervals on
, and consider the set of integers
. The closure of
,
is the smallest closed set containing
. The smallest closed set containing
is
since
is open as
is an arbitrary union of open sets:

So what is the interior of
? It is the largest open set contained in
. All open sets of
with respect to this topology
are either the empty set, an open interval, a union of open intervals, or the whole set (the union of all open intervals). But no open intervals are contained in
and so:

Therefore
is a nowhere dense set in
with respect to the usual topology
on
.
Sets of the First and Second Categories in a Topological Space
Recall that if
is a topological space then a set
is said to be dense in
if the intersection of
with all open sets (except for the empty set) is nonempty, that is, for all
we have that:

Furthermore,
is said to be nowhere dense if the interior of the closure of
is empty, that is:

We will now look at two very important definitions regarding whether an arbitrary set
can either be written as the union of a countable collection of nowhere dense subsets of
or not.
Definition: Let
be a topological space. A set
is said to be of The First Category or Meager if
can be expressed as the union of a countable number of nowhere dense subsets of
. If
cannot be expressed as such a union, then
is said to be of The Second Category or Nonmeager.
Note that in general it is much easier to show that a set
of a topological space
is of the first category since we only need to find a countable collection of nowhere dense subsets, say
(possibly finite) where each
is nowhere dense such that:

Showing that
is of the second category is much more difficult since we must show that no such union of a countable collection of nowhere dense subsets from
equals
.
For an example of a set of the first category, consider the topological space
where
is the usual topology of open intervals and consider the set
of rational numbers. We already know that the set of rational numbers is countable, so the following union is a union of a countable collection of subsets of
:

Each of the sets
is nowhere dense. Therefore
can be expressed as the union of a countable collection of nowhere dense subsets of
, so
is of the first category.
The Baire Category Theorem
Lemma 1: Let
be a topological space and let
. If
is a nowhere dense set then for every
there exists a
such that
.
Theorem 1 (The Baire Category Theorem): Every complete metric space is of the second category.
- Proof: Let
be a complete metric space. Then every Cauchy sequence
of elements from
converges in
. Suppose that
is of the first category. Then there exists a countable collection of nowhere dense sets
such that:

- Let
. For each nowhere dense set
,
there exists a set
such that
.
- Let
be a ball contained in
such that
. Let
be a ball contained in
whose radius is
and such that
. Repeat this process. For each
let
be a ball contained in
whose radius is
and such that
and such that
.
- The sequence
is Cauchy since as
gets large, the elements
are very close. Since
is a complete metric space, we must have that this Cauchy sequence therefore converges to some
, i.e.,
.
- Now notice that
for all
because if not, then there exists an
such that
for all
. Hence
is open and so there exists an open ball
such that
but then
because
for all
.
- Since
for all
then since
we must have that then 
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: