Difference between revisions of "Compactness in Metric Spaces"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<p>Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.</p>
 
<p>Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.</p>
 
<p>We also said that a subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F</math></span> is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> is an open covering) if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S</math></span> is also a cover of <span class="math-inline"><math>S</math></span>, that is:</p>
 
<p>We also said that a subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F</math></span> is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> is an open covering) if <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal S</math></span> is also a cover of <span class="math-inline"><math>S</math></span>, that is:</p>
<span class="equation-number">(2)</span>
+
 
<div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad S \subseteq \bigcup_{A \in \mathcal S} A \quad \text{ where } \mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F \end{align}</math></div>
+
<div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad S \subseteq \bigcup_{A \in \mathcal{S}} A \quad \text{where} \: \mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F \end{align}</math></div>
 
<p>We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.</p>
 
<p>We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.</p>
 
<blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;">
 
<blockquote style="background: white; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;">
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<p>Let <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* = \max \{ n_1, n_2, ..., n_p \}</math></span>. Then due to the nesting of the open covering <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span>, we see that:</p>
 
<p>Let <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* = \max \{ n_1, n_2, ..., n_p \}</math></span>. Then due to the nesting of the open covering <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span>, we see that:</p>
 
<div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \bigcup_{k=1}^{p} \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n_p} \right ) = \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right ) \end{align}</math></div>
 
<div style="text-align: center;"><math>\begin{align} \quad \bigcup_{k=1}^{p} \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n_p} \right ) = \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right ) \end{align}</math></div>
<p>But for <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1) \subseteq \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right )</math></span> we need <span class="math-inline"><math>1 \leq 1 - \frac{1}{n^*}</math></span>. But <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* \in \mathbb{N}</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* &gt; 0</math></span> and <span class="math-inline"><math>\frac{1}{n^*} &gt; 0</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>1 - \frac{1}{n^*} &lt; 1</math></span>. Therefore any finite subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F^*</math></span> of <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> cannot cover <span class="math-inline"><math>S = (0, 1)</math></span>. Hence, <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1)</math></span> is not compact.</p>
+
<p>But for <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1) \subseteq \left ( 0, 1 - \frac{1}{n^*} \right )</math></span> we need <span class="math-inline"><math>1 \leq 1 - \frac{1}{n^*}</math></span>. But <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* \in \mathbb{N}</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>n^* > 0</math></span> and <span class="math-inline"><math>\frac{1}{n^*} > 0</math></span>, so <span class="math-inline"><math>1 - \frac{1}{n^*} < 1</math></span>. Therefore any finite subset <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F^*</math></span> of <span class="math-inline"><math>\mathcal F</math></span> cannot cover <span class="math-inline"><math>S = (0, 1)</math></span>. Hence, <span class="math-inline"><math>(0, 1)</math></span> is not compact.</p>

Revision as of 15:41, 8 November 2021

Compact Sets in a Metric Space

If is a metric space and then a cover or covering of is a collection of subsets in such that:

Furthermore, we said that an open cover (or open covering) is simply a cover that contains only open sets.

We also said that a subset is a subcover/subcovering (or open subcover/subcovering if is an open covering) if is also a cover of , that is:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{align}"): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \quad S \subseteq \bigcup_{A \in \mathcal{S}} A \quad \text{where} \: \mathcal S \subseteq \mathcal F \end{align}}

We can now define the concept of a compact set using the definitions above.

Definition: Let be a metric space. The subset is said to be Compact if every open covering of has a finite subcovering of .

In general, it may be more difficult to show that a subset of a metric space is compact than to show a subset of a metric space is not compact. So, let's look at an example of a subset of a metric space that is not compact.

Consider the metric space where is the Euclidean metric and consider the set . We claim that this set is not compact. To show that is not compact, we need to find an open covering of that does not have a finite subcovering. Consider the following open covering:

Clearly is an infinite subcovering of and furthermore:

Let be a finite subset of containing elements. Then:

Let . Then due to the nesting of the open covering , we see that:

But for we need . But , so and , so . Therefore any finite subset of cannot cover . Hence, is not compact.