|
|
Line 99: |
Line 99: |
| <p>It is very important to note that the cancellation law holds with regards to the operation <span class="math-inline"><math>\cdot</math></span> for any group <span class="math-inline"><math>(G, \cdot)</math></span>. We will see that the cancellation law does not necessarily hold with respect to an operation on a set when we look at algebraic structures with two defined operations.</p> | | <p>It is very important to note that the cancellation law holds with regards to the operation <span class="math-inline"><math>\cdot</math></span> for any group <span class="math-inline"><math>(G, \cdot)</math></span>. We will see that the cancellation law does not necessarily hold with respect to an operation on a set when we look at algebraic structures with two defined operations.</p> |
| <p>It is also important to note that if <span class="math-inline"><math>a \cdot b = c \cdot a</math></span> or <span class="math-inline"><math>b \cdot a = a \cdot c</math></span> then we cannot necessarily deduce that <span class="math-inline"><math>b = c</math></span> because we would then require the additional property that <span class="math-inline"><math>\cdot</math></span> is commutative which is not one of the group axioms (but instead one of the Abelian group axioms).</p> | | <p>It is also important to note that if <span class="math-inline"><math>a \cdot b = c \cdot a</math></span> or <span class="math-inline"><math>b \cdot a = a \cdot c</math></span> then we cannot necessarily deduce that <span class="math-inline"><math>b = c</math></span> because we would then require the additional property that <span class="math-inline"><math>\cdot</math></span> is commutative which is not one of the group axioms (but instead one of the Abelian group axioms).</p> |
| + | |
| + | == Licensing == |
| + | Content obtained and/or adapted from: |
| + | * [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/abstract-algebra Abstract Algebra, mathonline.wikidot.com] under a CC BY-SA license |
Recall that an operation
on
is said to be associative if for all
we have that
and
is said to be commutative if for all
we have that
.
An element
is the identity element of
under
if for all
we have that
and
.
We can now begin to describe our first type of algebraic structures known as groups, which are a set
equipped with a binary operation
that is associative, contains an identity element, and contains inverse elements under
for each element in
.
Definition: A Group is a pair
where
is a set and
is a binary operation on
with the following properties:
1. For all
,
(Associativity of
).
2. There exists an
such that for all
,
and
(The existence of an Identity Element).
3. For all
there exists an
such that
and
(The existence of inverses).
Furthermore, if
is a finite set then the group
is said to be a Finite Group and if
is an infinite set then the group
is said to be an Infinite Group. More generally, the Order of
(or **Size of
) is the size of
and is denoted
.
When we use the multiplication symbol
to denote the operation on
, we often call
a “multiplicative group”. When the operation of the group is instead denoted by
(instead of
) then we often call
an “additive group”, and we write the inverse of each
as
(instead of
).
Some of the sets and binary operations we have already seen can be considered groups. For example,
is a group under standard addition
since the sum of any two real numbers is a real number,
, is associative, an additive identity
exists and inverse elements exist for every
(namely
).
Furthermore,
is also a group under the operation of standard addition since the sum of any two integers is an integer, addition is associative, the additivity identity is
, and for all
we have
as additive inverses.
We will examine many other (more interesting) groups later on, but for now, let's look at an example of a set and a binary operation that does NOT form a group.
Example 1
Consider the set of integers
and define
for all
by:

(Where the
on the righthand side is usual addition of numbers). We will show that
is NOT a group by showing that
is not associative. Let
. Then
is not associative since:


Clearly
so
does not form a group under the operation
.
Basic Theorems Regarding Groups
Recall that a group
is a set
with a binary operation
such that:
- 1)
is associative, i.e., for all
,
.
- 2) There exists an identity element
such that
for all
.
- 3) For each
there exists an
such that
.
We will now look at some rather basic results regarding groups which we can derive from the group axioms above.
Proposition 1: Let
be a group and let
be the identity for this group. Then:
a) The identity element
is unique.
b) For each
, the corresponding inverse
is unique.
c) For each
,
.
d) For all
,
.
e) For all
, if
then
and
.
f) If
then
.
- Proof of a) Suppose that
and
are both identities for
. Then:

- Therefore
so the identity for
is unique. 
- Proof of b) Suppose that
and
are both inverses for
under
. Then:

- Therefore
so the inverse for
is unique. 
- Proof of c) Let
. Then
is the inverse to
. However, the inverse to
is
and by (b) we have shown that the inverse of each element in
is unique. Therefore
. 
- Proof of d) If we apply the operation
between
and
we get:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad (a\cdot b)\cdot [b^{-1}\cdot a^{-1}]&=a\cdot [(b\cdot b^{-1})\cdot a^{-1}]\\\quad &=a\cdot [e\cdot a^{-1}]\\\quad &=a\cdot a^{-1}\\\quad &=e\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3434121845f2a34b61c7572a8191ab024cbb79d9)
- Therefore the inverse of
is
. We also have that the invere of
is
. By (b), the inverse of
is unique and so:

- Proof of e) Suppose that
. Then:


- Proof of f) Suppose that
. Then:

- Hence
. Alternatively we see that if
then the inverse of
with respect to
is
, that is
. Multiplying both sides of this equation by
gives us that
. 
Cancellation Law
We will now look at another important property of groups called the cancellation law.
Theorem 1 (The Cancellation Law for Groups): Let
be a group and let
. If
or
then
.
- Proof: Let
denote the inverse of
under
. Suppose that
. Then:

- Similarly, suppose now that
. Then:

It is very important to note that the cancellation law holds with regards to the operation
for any group
. We will see that the cancellation law does not necessarily hold with respect to an operation on a set when we look at algebraic structures with two defined operations.
It is also important to note that if
or
then we cannot necessarily deduce that
because we would then require the additional property that
is commutative which is not one of the group axioms (but instead one of the Abelian group axioms).
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: