Recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be pointwise convergent if for all and for all there exists an such that if then:
Also recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be uniformly convergent if for all there exists an such that if then for all we have that:
We will now extend the concept of pointwise convergence and uniform convergence to series of functions.
Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Pointwise Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums (where ) is pointwise convergent to .
For example, consider the following sequence of functions defined on the interval :
We now that this series converges pointwise for all since the result series is simply a geometric series to the sum function .
Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Uniformly Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is uniformly convergent to .
The geometric series given above actually converges uniformly on , though, showing this with the current definition of uniform convergence of series of functions is laborious. We will soon develop methods to determine whether a series of functions converges uniformly or not without having to brute-force apply the definition for uniform convergence for the sequence of partial sums.
Cauchy's Uniform Convergence Criterion for Series of Functions
If we have a sequence of functions with common domain then the corresponding series of functions is said to be uniformly convergent if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is a uniformly convergent sequence of functions.
We will now look at a nice theorem known as Cauchy's uniform convergence criterion for series of functions.
Theorem 1: Let be a sequence of real-valued functions with common domain . Then is uniformly convergent on if and only if for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that for all . |
- Proof: Suppose that is uniformly convergent to some limit function on . Let denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that uniformly on . So, for there exists an such that if and for all we have that:
\begin{align} \quad \mid s_n(x) - f(x) \mid < \epsilon \end{align}
- For any let . Then and so:
\begin{align} \quad \quad \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| = \mid s_m(x) - s_n(x) \mid \leq \mid s_m(x) - f(x) \mid + \mid f(x) - s_n(x) \mid < \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_1 = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}
- Suppose that for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that:
\begin{align} \quad \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \epsilon \end{align}
- Let . Assume without loss of generality that and that for some . Then from above we see that for all :
\begin{align} \quad \mid s_m(x) - s_n(x) \mid = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \epsilon \end{align}
- So converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So converges uniformly on .
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: