The Uniqueness of Limits of a Function Theorem
Recall from <a href="/the-limit-of-a-function">The Limit of a Function</a> page that for a function
where
is a cluster point of
, then
if
such that if
and
then
. We have not yet established that the limit
is unique, so is it possible that
and
where
? The following theorem will show that this cannot happen.
Theorem (Uniqueness of Limits): Let be a function and let be a cluster point of . Then if are both limits of at , that is and , then . |
- Proof: Let
be a function and let
be a cluster point of
. Also let
and
. Suppose that
. We will show that this leads to a contradiction. Let
be given.
- Since
, then for
such that if
and
then
.
- Similarly, since
then for
such that if
and
then
. Now let
and so we have that:
(1)
Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{align}"): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \quad \quad \mid L - M \mid = \mid L - f(x) + f(x) - M \mid ≤ \mid L - f(x) \mid + \mid f(x) - M \mid < \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_2 = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}}
- But
is arbitrary, so this implies that
, that is
, a contradiction. So our assumption that
was false, and so if
then
is unique. 