The Limit Theorems for Functions

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Revision as of 15:12, 21 October 2021 by Lila (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Uniqueness of Limits of a Function Theorem

Recall from <a href="/the-limit-of-a-function">The Limit of a Function</a> page that for a function where is a cluster point of , then if such that if and then . We have not yet established that the limit is unique, so is it possible that and where ? The following theorem will show that this cannot happen.

Theorem (Uniqueness of Limits): Let be a function and let be a cluster point of . Then if are both limits of at , that is and , then .
  • Proof: Let be a function and let be a cluster point of . Also let and . Suppose that . We will show that this leads to a contradiction. Let be given.
  • Since , then for such that if and then .
  • Similarly, since then for such that if and then . Now let and so we have that:

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \quad \quad \mid L - M \mid = \mid L - f(x) + f(x) - M \mid ≤ \mid L - f(x) \mid + \mid f(x) - M \mid < \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_2 = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}}

  • But is arbitrary, so this implies that , that is , a contradiction. So our assumption that was false, and so if then is unique.