Difference between revisions of "Linear Independence of Functions"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  
<math>\begin{align} \quad W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n)  \big|_{t_0} \neq 0 \end{align}</math>
+
<math>\begin{align} \quad W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n)  \bigg|_{t_0} \neq 0 \end{align}</math>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Thus this implies that following system of equations have only trivial solution <math>k_1 = k_2 = ... = k_n = 0</math>:</li>
 
<li>Thus this implies that following system of equations have only trivial solution <math>k_1 = k_2 = ... = k_n = 0</math>:</li>
Line 40: Line 40:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><math>\Leftarrow</math> We will prove the converse of Theorem 1 by contradiction. Suppose that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent on <math>I</math>, and assume that instead <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> do NOT form a fundamental set of solutions on <math>I</math>. Then for some <math>t_0 \in I</math>, the Wronskian <math>W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n)  \right|_{t_0} = 0</math>. Thus the system of equations above does not have only the trivial solution. Let the constants <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, &#8230;, <math>k_n^*</math> be a nontrivial solution to this system. Define <math>\phi(t)</math> as:</li>
+
<li><math>\Leftarrow</math> We will prove the converse of Theorem 1 by contradiction. Suppose that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent on <math>I</math>, and assume that instead <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> do NOT form a fundamental set of solutions on <math>I</math>. Then for some <math>t_0 \in I</math>, the Wronskian <math>W(y_1, y_2, ..., y_n)  \bigg|_{t_0} = 0</math>. Thus the system of equations above does not have only the trivial solution. Let the constants <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, &#8230;, <math>k_n^*</math> be a nontrivial solution to this system. Define <math>\phi(t)</math> as:</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  
Line 55: Line 55:
 
<li>But <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent which implies that <math>k_1^* = k_2^* = ... = k_n^* = 0</math>. Thus <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, &#8230;, <math>k_n^*</math> is a trivial solution to the system above, which is a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> do not form a fundamental set of solutions was false. <math>\blacksquare</math></li>
 
<li>But <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> are linearly independent which implies that <math>k_1^* = k_2^* = ... = k_n^* = 0</math>. Thus <math>k_1^*</math>, <math>k_2^*</math>, &#8230;, <math>k_n^*</math> is a trivial solution to the system above, which is a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that <math>y_1</math>, <math>y_2</math>, &#8230;, <math>y_n</math> do not form a fundamental set of solutions was false. <math>\blacksquare</math></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 +
 +
==Licensing==
 +
Content obtained and/or adapted from:
 +
* [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/linear-independence-dependence-of-a-set-of-functions Linear Independence Dependence of a Set of Functions, http://mathonline.wikidot.com/] under a CC BY-SA license

Latest revision as of 18:04, 28 October 2021

If we have an order linear homogenous differential equation where , , …, are continuous on an open interval and if , , …, are solutions to this differential equation, then provided that for at least one point , then , , …, form a fundamental set of solutions to this differential equation - that is, for constants , , …, , then every solution to this differential equation can be written in the form:

We will now look at the connection between the solutions , , …, forming a fundamental set of solutions and the linear independence/dependence of such solutions. We first define linear independence and linear dependence below.

Definition: The functions , , …, are said to be Linearly Independent on an interval if for constants , , …, we have that implies that for all . This set of functions is said to be Linearly Dependent if where , , …, are not all zero for all .

Perhaps the simplest linearly independent sets of functions is that set that contains , , and . Let , , and be constants and consider the following equation:

It's not hard to see that equation above is satisfied if and only if the constants .

For another example, consider the functions and defined on all of . This set of functions is not linearly independent. To show this, let and be constants and consider the following equation:

Now choose . Then we have that:

But the above equation is true for any choice of constants and since , and thus and do not form a linearly independent set on all of .

From the concept of linear independence/dependence, we obtain the following theorem on fundamental sets of solutions for order linear homogenous differential equations.

Theorem 1: Let be an order linear homogenous differential equation. If , , …, are solutions to this differential equation then , , …, form a fundamental set of solutions to this differential equation on the open interval if and only if , , …, are linearly dependent on .

  • Proof: Consider the following order linear homogenous differential equation:

  • Suppose that , , …, form a fundamental set of solutions to this differential equation on the open interval . Then this implies that for all we have that :

  • Thus this implies that following system of equations have only trivial solution :

  • Thus the equation implies that . Thus , , …, are linearly independent on .
  • We will prove the converse of Theorem 1 by contradiction. Suppose that , , …, are linearly independent on , and assume that instead , , …, do NOT form a fundamental set of solutions on . Then for some , the Wronskian . Thus the system of equations above does not have only the trivial solution. Let the constants , , …, be a nontrivial solution to this system. Define as:

  • Note that satisfies the initial conditions , , …, , and satisfies our order linear homogenous differential equation because is a linear combination of the solutions , , …, .
  • Now note that the function also satisfies the differential equation and the initial conditions. By the existence/uniqueness theorem for order linear homogenous differential equations, this implies that for all , so:

  • But , , …, are linearly independent which implies that . Thus , , …, is a trivial solution to the system above, which is a contradiction. Therefore our assumption that , , …, do not form a fundamental set of solutions was false.

Licensing

Content obtained and/or adapted from: