Difference between revisions of "Real Function Limits:Sequential Criterion"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function
 
The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function
<p>We will now look at a very important theorem known as The Sequential Criterion for a Limit which merges the concept of the limit of a function $f$ at a cluster point $c$ from $A$ with regards to sequences $(a_n)$ from $A$ that converge to $c$.</p>
+
<p>We will now look at a very important theorem known as The Sequential Criterion for a Limit which merges the concept of the limit of a function <math>f</math> at a cluster point <math>c</math> from <math>A</math> with regards to sequences <math>(a_n)</math> from <math>A</math> that converge to <math>c</math>.</p>
 
<table class="wiki-content-table">
 
<table class="wiki-content-table">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td><strong>Theorem 1 (The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function):</strong> Let $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ be a function and let $c$ be a cluster point of $A$. Then $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ if and only if for all sequences $(a_n)$ from the domain $A$ where $a_n \neq c$ $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c$ then $\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L$.</td>
+
<td><strong>Theorem 1 (The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function):</strong> Let <math>f : A \to \mathbb{R}</math> be a function and let <math>c</math> be a cluster point of <math>A</math>. Then <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L</math> if and only if for all sequences <math>(a_n)</math> from the domain <math>A</math> where <math>a_n \neq c</math> <math>\forall n \in \mathbb{N}</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c</math> then <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L</math>.</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
<p>Consider a function $f$ that has a limit $L$ when $x$ is close to $c$. Now consider all sequences $(a_n)$ from the domain $A$ where these sequences converge to $c$, that is $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c$. The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function says that then that as $n$ goes to infinity, the function $f$ evaluated at these $a_n$ will have its limit go to $L$.</p>
+
<p>Consider a function <math>f</math> that has a limit <math>L</math> when <math>x</math> is close to <math>c</math>. Now consider all sequences <math>(a_n)</math> from the domain <math>A</math> where these sequences converge to <math>c</math>, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c</math>. The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function says that then that as <math>n</math> goes to infinity, the function <math>f</math> evaluated at these <math>a_n</math> will have its limit go to <math>L</math>.</p>
<p>For example, consider the function $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ defined by the equation $f(x) = x$, and suppose we wanted to compute $\lim_{x \to 0} x$. We should already know that this limit is zero, that is $\lim_{x \to 0} x = 0$. Now consider the sequence $(a_n) = \left ( \frac{1}{n} \right)$. This sequence $(a_n)$ is clearly contained in the domain of $f$. Furthermore, this sequence converges to 0, that is $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n} = 0$. If all such sequences $(a_n)$ that converge to $0$ have the property that $(f(a_n))$ converges to $f(0) = 0$, then we can say that $\lim_{n \to 0} f(x) = 0$.</p>
+
<p>For example, consider the function <math>f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}</math> defined by the equation <math>f(x) = x</math>, and suppose we wanted to compute <math>\lim_{x \to 0} x</math>. We should already know that this limit is zero, that is <math>\lim_{x \to 0} x = 0</math>. Now consider the sequence <math>(a_n) = \left ( \frac{1}{n} \right)</math>. This sequence <math>(a_n)</math> is clearly contained in the domain of <math>f</math>. Furthermore, this sequence converges to 0, that is <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n} = 0</math>. If all such sequences <math>(a_n)</math> that converge to <math>0</math> have the property that <math>(f(a_n))</math> converges to <math>f(0) = 0</math>, then we can say that <math>\lim_{n \to 0} f(x) = 0</math>.</p>
 
<p>We will now look at the proof of The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function.</p>
 
<p>We will now look at the proof of The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function.</p>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><strong>Proof:</strong> $\Rightarrow$ Suppose that $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$, and let $(a_n)$ be a sequence in $A$ such that $a_n \neq c$ $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c$. We thus want to show that $\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L$.</li>
+
<li><strong>Proof:</strong> <math>\Rightarrow</math> Suppose that <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L</math>, and let <math>(a_n)</math> be a sequence in <math>A</math> such that <math>a_n \neq c</math> <math>\forall n \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c</math>. We thus want to show that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L</math>.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Let $\epsilon &gt; 0$. We are given that $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ and so for $\epsilon &gt; 0$ there exists a $\delta &gt; 0$ such that if $x \in A$ and $0 &lt; \mid x - c \mid &lt; \delta$ then we have that $\mid f(x) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon$. Now since $\delta &gt; 0$, since we have that $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c$ then there exists an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that if $n ≥ N$ then $\mid a_n - c \mid &lt; \delta$. Therefore $a_n \in V_{\delta} (c) \cap A$.</li>
+
<li>Let <math>\epsilon &gt; 0</math>. We are given that <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L</math> and so for <math>\epsilon &gt; 0</math> there exists a <math>\delta &gt; 0</math> such that if <math>x \in A</math> and <math>0 &lt; \mid x - c \mid &lt; \delta</math> then we have that <math>\mid f(x) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon</math>. Now since <math>\delta &gt; 0</math>, since we have that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c</math> then there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n ≥ N</math> then <math>\mid a_n - c \mid &lt; \delta</math>. Therefore <math>a_n \in V_{\delta} (c) \cap A</math>.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Therefore it must be that $\mid f(a_n) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon$, in other words, $\forall n ≥ N$ we have that $\mid f(a_n) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon$ and so $\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L$.</li>
+
<li>Therefore it must be that <math>\mid f(a_n) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon</math>, in other words, <math>\forall n ≥ N</math> we have that <math>\mid f(a_n) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon</math> and so <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L</math>.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>$\Leftarrow$ Suppose that for all $(a_n)$ in $A$ such that $a_n \neq c$ $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c$, we have that $\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L$. We want to show that $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$.</li>
+
<li><math>\Leftarrow</math> Suppose that for all <math>(a_n)</math> in <math>A</math> such that <math>a_n \neq c</math> <math>\forall n \in \mathbb{N}</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c</math>, we have that <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = L</math>. We want to show that <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L</math>.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>Suppose not, in other words, suppose that $\exists \epsilon_0 &gt; 0$ such that $\forall \delta &gt; 0$ then $\exists x_{\delta} \in A \cap V_{\delta} (c) \setminus \{ c \}$ such that $\mid f(x_{\delta}) - L \mid ≥ \epsilon_0$. Let $\delta_n = \frac{1}{n}$. Then there exists $x_{\delta_n} = a_n \in A \cap V_{\delta_n} (c) \setminus \{ c \}$, in other words, $0 &lt; \mid a_n - c \mid &lt; \frac{1}{n}$ and $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c$. However, $\mid f(a_n) - L \mid ≥ \epsilon_0$ so $\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) \neq L$, a contradiction. Therefore $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$. $\blacksquare$</li>
+
<li>Suppose not, in other words, suppose that <math>\exists \epsilon_0 &gt; 0</math> such that <math>\forall \delta &gt; 0</math> then <math>\exists x_{\delta} \in A \cap V_{\delta} (c) \setminus \{ c \}</math> such that <math>\mid f(x_{\delta}) - L \mid ≥ \epsilon_0</math>. Let <math>\delta_n = \frac{1}{n}</math>. Then there exists <math>x_{\delta_n} = a_n \in A \cap V_{\delta_n} (c) \setminus \{ c \}</math>, in other words, <math>0 &lt; \mid a_n - c \mid &lt; \frac{1}{n}</math> and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = c</math>. However, <math>\mid f(a_n) - L \mid ≥ \epsilon_0</math> so <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} f(a_n) \neq L</math>, a contradiction. Therefore <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
  
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==
 
* [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-sequential-criterion-for-a-limit-of-a-function The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function]
 
* [http://mathonline.wikidot.com/the-sequential-criterion-for-a-limit-of-a-function The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function]

Revision as of 09:38, 20 October 2021

The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function

We will now look at a very important theorem known as The Sequential Criterion for a Limit which merges the concept of the limit of a function at a cluster point from with regards to sequences from that converge to .

Theorem 1 (The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function): Let be a function and let be a cluster point of . Then if and only if for all sequences from the domain where and then .

Consider a function that has a limit when is close to . Now consider all sequences from the domain where these sequences converge to , that is . The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function says that then that as goes to infinity, the function evaluated at these will have its limit go to .

For example, consider the function defined by the equation , and suppose we wanted to compute . We should already know that this limit is zero, that is . Now consider the sequence . This sequence is clearly contained in the domain of . Furthermore, this sequence converges to 0, that is . If all such sequences that converge to have the property that converges to , then we can say that .

We will now look at the proof of The Sequential Criterion for a Limit of a Function.

  • Proof: Suppose that , and let be a sequence in such that such that . We thus want to show that .
  • Let Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \epsilon &gt; 0} . We are given that and so for Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \epsilon &gt; 0} there exists a Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \delta &gt; 0} such that if and Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle 0 &lt; \mid x - c \mid &lt; \delta} then we have that Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mid f(x) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon} . Now since Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \delta &gt; 0} , since we have that then there exists an such that if Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle n ≥ N} then Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mid a_n - c \mid &lt; \delta} . Therefore .
  • Therefore it must be that Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mid f(a_n) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon} , in other words, Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \forall n ≥ N} we have that Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mid f(a_n) - L \mid &lt; \epsilon} and so .
  • Suppose that for all in such that and , we have that . We want to show that .
  • Suppose not, in other words, suppose that Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \exists \epsilon_0 &gt; 0} such that Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \forall \delta &gt; 0} then such that Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mid f(x_{\delta}) - L \mid ≥ \epsilon_0} . Let . Then there exists , in other words, Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle 0 &lt; \mid a_n - c \mid &lt; \frac{1}{n}} and . However, Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mid f(a_n) - L \mid ≥ \epsilon_0} so , a contradiction. Therefore .


Resources