Difference between revisions of "Uniform Convergence of Series of Functions"

From Department of Mathematics at UTSA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
<p>The geometric series given above actually converges uniformly on <math>(-1, 1)</math>, though, showing this with the current definition of uniform convergence of series of functions is laborious. We will soon develop methods to determine whether a series of functions converges uniformly or not without having to brute-force apply the definition for uniform convergence for the sequence of partial sums.</p>
 
<p>The geometric series given above actually converges uniformly on <math>(-1, 1)</math>, though, showing this with the current definition of uniform convergence of series of functions is laborious. We will soon develop methods to determine whether a series of functions converges uniformly or not without having to brute-force apply the definition for uniform convergence for the sequence of partial sums.</p>
 +
 +
==Cauchy's Uniform Convergence Criterion for Series of Functions==
 +
<p>If we have a sequence of functions <math>(f_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> with common domain <math>X</math> then the corresponding series of functions <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is said to be uniformly convergent if the corresponding sequence of partial sums <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> is a uniformly convergent sequence of functions.</p>
 +
<p>We will now look at a nice theorem known as Cauchy's uniform convergence criterion for series of functions.</p>
 +
<table class="wiki-content-table">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><strong>Theorem 1:</strong> Let <math>(f_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> be a sequence of real-valued functions with common domain <math>X</math>. Then <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is uniformly convergent on <math>X</math> if and only if for all <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that <math>\displaystyle{ \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x)  \right| < \epsilon}</math> for all <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math>.</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><strong>Proof:</strong> <math>\Rightarrow</math> Suppose that <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> is uniformly convergent to some limit function <math>f(x)</math> on <math>X</math>. Let <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that <math>\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty} s_n(x) = f(x)}</math> uniformly on <math>X</math>. So, for <math>\epsilon_1 = \frac{\epsilon}{2}</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that:</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<div class="math-equation" id="equation-1">\begin{align} \quad \mid s_n(x) - f(x) \mid < \epsilon \end{align}</div>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>For any <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math> let <math>m = n + p</math>. Then <math>m \geq N</math> and so:</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<div class="math-equation" id="equation-2">\begin{align} \quad \quad  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| =  \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x)  \right| = \mid s_m(x) - s_n(x) \mid \leq \mid s_m(x) - f(x) \mid + \mid f(x) - s_n(x) \mid < \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_1 = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}</div>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><math>\Leftarrow</math> Suppose that for all <math>\epsilon > 0</math> there exists an <math>N \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that if <math>n \geq N</math> and for all <math>x \in X</math> we have that:</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 +
<div class="math-equation" id="equation-3">\begin{align} \quad  \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x)  \right| < \epsilon \end{align}</div>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Let <math>m, n \geq N</math>. Assume without loss of generality that <math>m > n</math> and that <math>m = n + p</math> for some <math>p \in \mathbb{N}</math>. Then from above we see that for all <math>x \in X</math>:</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<div class="math-equation" id="equation-4">\begin{align} \quad \mid s_m(x) - s_n(x) \mid =  \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x)  \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \epsilon \end{align}</div>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>So <math>(s_n(x))_{n=1}^{\infty}</math> converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So <math>\displaystyle{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x)}</math> converges uniformly on <math>X</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math></li>
 +
</ul>
  
  

Revision as of 13:49, 27 October 2021

Recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be pointwise convergent if for all and for all there exists an such that if then:

Also recall that a sequence of functions with common domain is said to be uniformly convergent if for all there exists an such that if then for all we have that:

We will now extend the concept of pointwise convergence and uniform convergence to series of functions.

Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Pointwise Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums (where ) is pointwise convergent to .

For example, consider the following sequence of functions defined on the interval :

We now that this series converges pointwise for all since the result series is simply a geometric series to the sum function .

Definition: Let be a sequence of functions with common domain . The corresponding series is said to be Uniformly Convergent to the sum function if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is uniformly convergent to .

The geometric series given above actually converges uniformly on , though, showing this with the current definition of uniform convergence of series of functions is laborious. We will soon develop methods to determine whether a series of functions converges uniformly or not without having to brute-force apply the definition for uniform convergence for the sequence of partial sums.

Cauchy's Uniform Convergence Criterion for Series of Functions

If we have a sequence of functions with common domain then the corresponding series of functions is said to be uniformly convergent if the corresponding sequence of partial sums is a uniformly convergent sequence of functions.

We will now look at a nice theorem known as Cauchy's uniform convergence criterion for series of functions.

Theorem 1: Let be a sequence of real-valued functions with common domain . Then is uniformly convergent on if and only if for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that for all .
  • Proof: Suppose that is uniformly convergent to some limit function on . Let denote the sequence of partial sums for this series. Then we must have that uniformly on . So, for there exists an such that if and for all we have that:
\begin{align} \quad \mid s_n(x) - f(x) \mid < \epsilon \end{align}
  • For any let . Then and so:
\begin{align} \quad \quad \left| \sum_{k=1}^{m} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| = \mid s_m(x) - s_n(x) \mid \leq \mid s_m(x) - f(x) \mid + \mid f(x) - s_n(x) \mid < \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_1 = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \end{align}
  • Suppose that for all there exists an such that if and for all we have that:
\begin{align} \quad \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \epsilon \end{align}
  • Let . Assume without loss of generality that and that for some . Then from above we see that for all :
\begin{align} \quad \mid s_m(x) - s_n(x) \mid = \left| \sum_{k=1}^{n+p} f_k(x) - \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_k(x) \right| = \left| \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+p} f_k(x) \right| < \epsilon \end{align}
  • So converges uniformly by the Cauchy uniform convergence criterion for sequences of functions. So converges uniformly on .


Licensing

Content obtained and/or adapted from: