Groups
Recall that an operation
on
is said to be associative if for all
we have that
and
is said to be commutative if for all
we have that
.
An element
is the identity element of
under
if for all
we have that
and
.
We can now begin to describe our first type of algebraic structures known as groups, which are a set
equipped with a binary operation
that is associative, contains an identity element, and contains inverse elements under
for each element in
.
Definition: A Group is a pair
where
is a set and
is a binary operation on
with the following properties:
1. For all
,
(Associativity of
).
2. There exists an
such that for all
,
and
(The existence of an Identity Element).
3. For all
there exists an
such that
and
(The existence of inverses).
Furthermore, if
is a finite set then the group
is said to be a Finite Group and if
is an infinite set then the group
is said to be an Infinite Group. More generally, the Order of
(or **Size of
) is the size of
and is denoted
.
When we use the multiplication symbol
to denote the operation on
, we often call
a “multiplicative group”. When the operation of the group is instead denoted by
(instead of
) then we often call
an “additive group”, and we write the inverse of each
as
(instead of
).
Some of the sets and binary operations we have already seen can be considered groups. For example,
is a group under standard addition
since the sum of any two real numbers is a real number,
, is associative, an additive identity
exists and inverse elements exist for every
(namely
).
Furthermore,
is also a group under the operation of standard addition since the sum of any two integers is an integer, addition is associative, the additivity identity is
, and for all
we have
as additive inverses.
We will examine many other (more interesting) groups later on, but for now, let's look at an example of a set and a binary operation that does NOT form a group.
Example 1
Consider the set of integers
and define
for all
by:

(Where the
on the righthand side is usual addition of numbers). We will show that
is NOT a group by showing that
is not associative. Let
. Then
is not associative since:


Clearly
so
does not form a group under the operation
.
Basic Theorems Regarding Groups
A group
is a set
with a binary operation
such that:
- 1)
is associative, i.e., for all
,
.
- 2) There exists an identity element
such that
for all
.
- 3) For each
there exists an
such that
.
We will now look at some rather basic results regarding groups which we can derive from the group axioms above.
Proposition 1: Let
be a group and let
be the identity for this group. Then:
a) The identity element
is unique.
b) For each
, the corresponding inverse
is unique.
c) For each
,
.
d) For all
,
.
e) For all
, if
then
and
.
f) If
then
.
- Proof of a) Suppose that
and
are both identities for
. Then:

- Therefore
so the identity for
is unique. 
- Proof of b) Suppose that
and
are both inverses for
under
. Then:

- Therefore
so the inverse for
is unique. 
- Proof of c) Let
. Then
is the inverse to
. However, the inverse to
is
and by (b) we have shown that the inverse of each element in
is unique. Therefore
. 
- Proof of d) If we apply the operation
between
and
we get:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad (a\cdot b)\cdot [b^{-1}\cdot a^{-1}]&=a\cdot [(b\cdot b^{-1})\cdot a^{-1}]\\\quad &=a\cdot [e\cdot a^{-1}]\\\quad &=a\cdot a^{-1}\\\quad &=e\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3434121845f2a34b61c7572a8191ab024cbb79d9)
- Therefore the inverse of
is
. We also have that the invere of
is
. By (b), the inverse of
is unique and so:

- Proof of e) Suppose that
. Then:


- Proof of f) Suppose that
. Then:

- Hence
. Alternatively we see that if
then the inverse of
with respect to
is
, that is
. Multiplying both sides of this equation by
gives us that
. 
Subgroups and Group Extensions
Definition: Let
be a group. If
and
forms a group under the same operation
then
is said to be a Subgroup of
. If
is a subgroup of
then we write
.
Definition: Let
be a group. If
is a group such that
then
is said to be a Group Extension of
.
For example, consider the group of complex numbers under the operation of standard addition,
. We know that the set of real numbers is a subset of the set of complex numbers, that is,
and so the group of real numbers under the operation of standard addition,
is a subgroup of
and
is a group extension of
.
We will now look at a nice theorem which tells us that to determine if
is a subgroup of
where
, that then we only need to check two of the four group axioms for verification
Theorem 1: If
is a group with the identity
and
then
is a subgroup of
if and only if
is closed under
and for all
there exists an
such that
and
.
- Proof: Let
be a group with the identity
of
and let
.
Suppose that
is a subgroup of
. Then by definition,
is a group itself and satisfies all of the group axioms - namely that
is closed under the operation
and that for all
there exists an
such that
and
.
Now suppose that
is closed under
and that for all
there exists an
such that
and
. These are precisely two of the group axioms we have looked at, and to show that
is a subgroup of
we only need to show that the other two axioms hold.
- First suppose that
and that
, that is, suppose that
is not associative on
. Since
we must have that
for this particular
which contradicts the associativity of
on the group
. Hence
must actually be associative on
.
- Now since
is closed under
and for
there exists an
such that
and
we must have that
and furthermore,
and
.
- Therefore
is a group, and in particular since
we have that
is a subgroup of
. 
Theorem 2: If
is a group with the identity
of
and
then
is a subgroup of
if and only if
and for all
we have that
.
- Proof:
If
is a subgroup of
then this direction is trivial.
Suppose that
and for all
we have that
. Since
there exists an
. So
.
- Now if
, then since
we have that
. So if
then
.
- Lastly, if
then
. Thus
. So
is closed under the operation
. Thus
is a subgroup of
. 
Order of an element in a group
Definition: Let
be a group and let
. The Order of
denoted by
or
is the smallest positive integer
such that
(where
is the identity element of
). If no such
exists then
is said to have order
.
If the operation is multiplicative in nature then we usually define the order of
as above. If the operation is instead additive in nature then we define the order of
as the smallest positive integer
such that
or
if no such positive integer
exists.
Example 1
If
is any group with identity
then the order of
is
.
Example 2
Consider the group
where
is defined for all
to be:

The order of
is trivially
. The order of
is
since:

The order of
is also
. In fact, the orders of
and
are also
.
Example 3
Consider the group
where
is defined for all
to be:

You should verify that the order of
is
, the order of
is
, the order of
is
, the order of
is
, the order of
is
, and the order of
is 
Example 4
Consider the group
. Then every nonzero
has order infinity since the equation
,
, has no solution in
.
Example 5
Consider the group
. The order of
is
since
.
Basic Theorems Regarding the Order of Elements in a Group
Proposition 1: Let
be a group. Then:
a)
if and only if
where
is the identity element of
.
b) If
then
.
c) If
then
. _
- Proof of a)
Suppose that
. Then
. So
.
The smallest positive integer such that
is
. So
. 
- Proof of b) Let
. Suppose that
has finite order, say
. Then
is the smallest positive integer such that
. So
. So
. If
then
implies that
, and since
we have arrived at a contradiction. Thus
.
- Now suppose that
has infinite order. If
has finite order, say
then
implies that
- contradicting
having infinite order. Thus
must also have infinite order.
- Proof of c) Let
. First, suppose that
. Then
is the smallest positive integer such that
. So
. Now observe that:

- Therefore
. But
, so
. Thus
. So
.
- By symmetry, we see that
. Thus
.
- Now suppose that
is infinite. If
then
. By the same argument above, we see that
- contradicting
having infinite order. Thus
is infinite. 
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: