Partial Derivatives of Functions from Rn to Rm
One of the core concepts of multivariable calculus involves the various differentiations of functions from
to
. We begin by defining the concept of a partial derivative of such functions.
Definition: Let
be open,
, and
. Denote
for each
, i.e.,
is the unit vector in the direction of the
coordinate axis. Then the Partial Derivative of
at
with Respect to the
Variable is defined as
provided that this limit exists.
Suppose that
is open,
, and
. Then the partial derivative of
at
with respect to the
variable is:

For example, consider the function
defined by:

Then the partial derivative of
with respect to the variable
at the point
is:

We can also easily calculate the partial derivatives
and
. So the definition of a partial derivative for
is somewhat justified since the case when
yields the definition of the partial derivative for a multivariable real-valued function.
Furthermore, suppose that
and that
. Then
where
for each
are single-variable real-valued functions. The partial derivative of
with respect to the first variable (the only variable, or simply just the derivative) at
is:

For example, consider the function
defined by:

Then the derivative of
is:

And the derivative of
at
is:

Once again, the definition is justified since when
we have that the definition reduces down to the special case of differentiating a single variable vector-valued function.
Now let's look at a more complicated example of computing a partial derivative. Let
be defined by:

Then the partial derivative of
at
with respect to the first variable is:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad D_{1}\mathbf {f} (\mathbf {c} )&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {\mathbf {f} (\mathbf {c} +h(1,0))-\mathbf {f} (\mathbf {c} )}{h}}\\&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {(f_{1}((c_{1},c_{2})+h(1,0)),f_{2}((c_{1},c_{2})+h(1,0)))-(f_{1}(\mathbf {c} ),f_{2}(c_{1},c_{2})))}{h}}\\&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {f_{1}(c_{1}+h,c_{2}),f_{2}(c_{1}+h,c_{2}))-(f_{1}(c_{1},c_{2}),f_{2}(c_{1},c_{2}))}{h}}\\&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {(f_{1}(c_{1}+h,c_{2})-f_{1}(c_{1},c_{2}),f_{2}(c_{1}+h,c_{2})-f_{2}(c_{1},c_{2}))}{h}}\\&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {((c_{1}+h)^{2}+c_{2}^{2}-[c_{1}^{2}+c_{2}^{2}],2(c_{1}+h)(c_{2})-2c_{1}c_{2})}{h}}\\&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {(c_{1}^{2}+2c_{1}h+h^{2})+c_{2}^{2}-c_{1}^{2}-c_{2}^{2},2c_{1}c_{2}+2c_{2}h-2c_{1}c_{2})}{h}}\\&=\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {(2c_{1}h+h^{2},2c_{2}h)}{h}}\\&=\left(\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {2c_{1}h+h^{2}}{h}},\lim _{h\to 0}{\frac {2c_{2}h}{h}}\right)\\&=\left(\lim _{h\to 0}[2c_{1}+h],\lim _{h\to 0}2c_{2}\right)\\&=(2c_{1},2c_{2})\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c5d7b7c9f89ec526eacbf8a531b56e8b82051027)
So the partial derivative of
with respect to the first variable at say
is
.
The Riemann Integral
Let
be a bounded function defined on the closed and bounded interval
. Let
be a partition of
with:

Let
denote the set of all partitions on
. For each
we define:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad M_{i}&=\sup\{f(x):x\in [x_{i-1},x_{i}]\}\\\quad m_{i}&=\inf\{f(x):x\in [x_{i-1},x_{i}]\}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/efd4221585cf9cf93fb33635540eda7a3ae15c83)
With the notation above we can define the upper and lower Riemann sums associated with the partition
for the function
.
- Definition: Let
be a bounded function on the closed and bounded interval
and let
. The Upper Riemann Sum Associated with the Partition
for
is
. The Lower Riemann Sum Associated with the Partition
for
is
.
It can be shown that for any partitions
with
we have that:

So as we consider partitions that are finer and finer,
decreases and
increases. It can also be shown that for any partitions
:

That is, the set of all upper Riemann sums is bounded below by any lower Riemann sum, and the set of all lower Riemann sums is bounded above by any upper Riemann sum. We now define the upper and lower Riemann integrals of a bounded function
on
.
- Definition: Let
be a bounded function on the closed and bounded interval
. The Upper Riemann Integral of
is defined to be
and the Lower Riemann Integral of
is defined to be
.
Another way t o define the upper and lower Riemann integrals of
is through step functions. If
is a step function defined on
then it is easy to show that the upper and lower Riemann integrals of
exist and define the upper and lower Riemann integrals of
to also be:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad (R){\overline {\int }}_{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx=\inf \left\{(R)\int _{a}^{b}\psi (x)\,dx:\psi {\text{is a step function}},f(x)\leq \psi (x){\text{on}}[a,b]\right\}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/bff1a052b910aa2900b25bd9378c759bfa6b592e)
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\quad (R){\underline {\int }}_{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx=\sup \left\{(R)\int _{a}^{b}\varphi (x)\,dx:\varphi {\text{is a step function}},\varphi (x)\leq f(x){\text{on}}[a,b]\right\}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a4d8b657fcd26adcc1a59f7f6ff922f687a5e611)
We are finally able to define what it means for a bounded function
defined on a closed and bounded interval
to be Riemann integrable.
- Definition: Let
be a bounded function on the closed and bounded interval
. Then
is said to be Riemann Integrable on
denoted
if
.
Licensing
Content obtained and/or adapted from: